Green Star is not a physical activity star

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report on research investigating the relationship between physical activity and workplace design. In particular, the paper explores the social–ecological context of a new workplace building. This paper seeks to understand why better physical activity outcomes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Creagh, Robyn, McGann, S., Tye, Marian, Jancey, Jonine, Babb, Courtney
Format: Journal Article
Published: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51286
_version_ 1848758660300275712
author Creagh, Robyn
McGann, S.
Tye, Marian
Jancey, Jonine
Babb, Courtney
author_facet Creagh, Robyn
McGann, S.
Tye, Marian
Jancey, Jonine
Babb, Courtney
author_sort Creagh, Robyn
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report on research investigating the relationship between physical activity and workplace design. In particular, the paper explores the social–ecological context of a new workplace building. This paper seeks to understand why better physical activity outcomes for the staff were not observed in the new building despite influence from a staff wellness committee during design; achieving success against existing best-practice indicators; and staff reporting increased feelings of wellness, energy and satisfaction with the new building. Design/methodology/approach: Three design aspects are taken as a focus from within an opportunistic pre-/post-physical activity study of an organisation as they move from a building they occupied for 30 years into a new purpose-designed building. This study was conducted through mixed methods, incorporating ethnographic, architectural and quantitative means. Findings: The social, spatial and personal context is important for understanding participant workplace-based physical activity. Despite the health and well-being goals and 5 Star Green Star outcomes of the new building, participants were sedentary for a substantive part of their workday in both buildings. Practical implications: A well-designed environment can support staff feeling healthier, but the 5 Star Green Star rating does not implicitly ensure a healthier, activity-promoting environment. Facilities managers and designers can act to provide physically active paths as the most straightforward circulation option in workplaces. Originality/value: The originality of this study lies in the opportunity to conduct a pre-/post-study of physical activity where the organisation, workforce and type of work are constant and where the variable is the building design, spatial configuration and location. The methods used in this study draw from both health promotion and architectural research practices. © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:47:31Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-51286
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:47:31Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-512862017-09-13T15:38:04Z Green Star is not a physical activity star Creagh, Robyn McGann, S. Tye, Marian Jancey, Jonine Babb, Courtney Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report on research investigating the relationship between physical activity and workplace design. In particular, the paper explores the social–ecological context of a new workplace building. This paper seeks to understand why better physical activity outcomes for the staff were not observed in the new building despite influence from a staff wellness committee during design; achieving success against existing best-practice indicators; and staff reporting increased feelings of wellness, energy and satisfaction with the new building. Design/methodology/approach: Three design aspects are taken as a focus from within an opportunistic pre-/post-physical activity study of an organisation as they move from a building they occupied for 30 years into a new purpose-designed building. This study was conducted through mixed methods, incorporating ethnographic, architectural and quantitative means. Findings: The social, spatial and personal context is important for understanding participant workplace-based physical activity. Despite the health and well-being goals and 5 Star Green Star outcomes of the new building, participants were sedentary for a substantive part of their workday in both buildings. Practical implications: A well-designed environment can support staff feeling healthier, but the 5 Star Green Star rating does not implicitly ensure a healthier, activity-promoting environment. Facilities managers and designers can act to provide physically active paths as the most straightforward circulation option in workplaces. Originality/value: The originality of this study lies in the opportunity to conduct a pre-/post-study of physical activity where the organisation, workforce and type of work are constant and where the variable is the building design, spatial configuration and location. The methods used in this study draw from both health promotion and architectural research practices. © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51286 10.1108/F-12-2015-0092 Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle Creagh, Robyn
McGann, S.
Tye, Marian
Jancey, Jonine
Babb, Courtney
Green Star is not a physical activity star
title Green Star is not a physical activity star
title_full Green Star is not a physical activity star
title_fullStr Green Star is not a physical activity star
title_full_unstemmed Green Star is not a physical activity star
title_short Green Star is not a physical activity star
title_sort green star is not a physical activity star
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51286