Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations

© 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLCIn order to address the shortcomings of the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) associated with the thin electrode, the anode-cathode-supported SOFC (ACSC) is proposed in this study. In the ACSC, the electrolyte is thin, while both the anode and cathode have enough th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su, S., Zhang, Q., Gao, Xiangpeng, Periasamy, V., Kong, W.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50916
_version_ 1848758567418462208
author Su, S.
Zhang, Q.
Gao, Xiangpeng
Periasamy, V.
Kong, W.
author_facet Su, S.
Zhang, Q.
Gao, Xiangpeng
Periasamy, V.
Kong, W.
author_sort Su, S.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLCIn order to address the shortcomings of the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) associated with the thin electrode, the anode-cathode-supported SOFC (ACSC) is proposed in this study. In the ACSC, the electrolyte is thin, while both the anode and cathode have enough thickness to act as self-supporting layers. The mathematical models of both the anode-supported SOFC (ASC) and ACSC are established, which capture the intricate interdependency among the charge and gas transport, and the electrochemical reactions. The validity of the mathematical model is preliminarily verified by the good agreement between the numerical and experimental I–V curves of the ASC button cell. For the same base case parameters and operating conditions, the average current density of ASC is 6388 A m-2, only 83% of the ACSC, 7713 A m-2. The advantages of ACSC mainly stem from two aspects: i) the increased oxygen concentration under the solid rib covered zone, which extends the reaction active zone; ii) the increased cross section of the electric current transport path, which greatly decreases the cathode ohmic polarization. The performance comparison between the ACSC and ASC are examined by systematically varying the cathode electric conductivity, porosity, tortuosity factor and the output voltage. The results indicated that the advantage of ACSC over ASC is always obvious although the performance of ACSC varies with different parameters.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:46:02Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-50916
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:46:02Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-509162017-10-02T02:28:10Z Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations Su, S. Zhang, Q. Gao, Xiangpeng Periasamy, V. Kong, W. © 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLCIn order to address the shortcomings of the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) associated with the thin electrode, the anode-cathode-supported SOFC (ACSC) is proposed in this study. In the ACSC, the electrolyte is thin, while both the anode and cathode have enough thickness to act as self-supporting layers. The mathematical models of both the anode-supported SOFC (ASC) and ACSC are established, which capture the intricate interdependency among the charge and gas transport, and the electrochemical reactions. The validity of the mathematical model is preliminarily verified by the good agreement between the numerical and experimental I–V curves of the ASC button cell. For the same base case parameters and operating conditions, the average current density of ASC is 6388 A m-2, only 83% of the ACSC, 7713 A m-2. The advantages of ACSC mainly stem from two aspects: i) the increased oxygen concentration under the solid rib covered zone, which extends the reaction active zone; ii) the increased cross section of the electric current transport path, which greatly decreases the cathode ohmic polarization. The performance comparison between the ACSC and ASC are examined by systematically varying the cathode electric conductivity, porosity, tortuosity factor and the output voltage. The results indicated that the advantage of ACSC over ASC is always obvious although the performance of ACSC varies with different parameters. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50916 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.221 Elsevier Ltd restricted
spellingShingle Su, S.
Zhang, Q.
Gao, Xiangpeng
Periasamy, V.
Kong, W.
Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
title Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
title_full Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
title_fullStr Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
title_short Effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
title_sort effects of changes in solid oxide fuel cell electrode thickness on ohmic and concentration polarizations
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50916