Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians

© 2017 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine & Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.Objectives: To provide contemporary Australian data on the public's training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and awareness of hands-only CPR. Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bray, Janet, Smith, K., Case, R., Cartledge, S., Straney, L., Finn, J.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50812
_version_ 1848758542015660032
author Bray, Janet
Smith, K.
Case, R.
Cartledge, S.
Straney, L.
Finn, J.
author_facet Bray, Janet
Smith, K.
Case, R.
Cartledge, S.
Straney, L.
Finn, J.
author_sort Bray, Janet
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2017 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine & Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.Objectives: To provide contemporary Australian data on the public's training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and awareness of hands-only CPR. Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey in April 2016 of adult residents of the Australian state of Victoria was conducted. Primary outcomes were rates of CPR training and awareness of hands-only CPR. Results: Of the 404 adults surveyed (mean age 55 ± 17 years, 59% female, 73% metropolitan residents), 274 (68%) had undergone CPR training. Only 50% (n = 201) had heard of hands-only CPR, with most citing first-aid courses (41%) and media (36%) as sources of information. Of those who had undergone training, the majority had received training more than 5 years previously (52%) and only 28% had received training or refreshed training in the past 12 months. Most received training in a formal first-aid class (43%), and received training as a requirement for work (67%). The most common reasons for not having training were: they had never thought about it (59%), did not have time (25%) and did not know where to learn (15%). Compared to standard CPR, a greater proportion of respondents were willing to provide hands-only CPR for strangers (67% vs 86%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: From an Australian perspective, there is still room for improvement in CPR training rates and awareness of hands-only CPR. Further promotion of hands-only CPR and self-instruction (e.g. DVD kits or online) may see further improvements in CPR training and bystander CPR rates.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:45:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-50812
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:45:38Z
publishDate 2017
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-508122017-09-13T15:35:12Z Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians Bray, Janet Smith, K. Case, R. Cartledge, S. Straney, L. Finn, J. © 2017 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine & Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.Objectives: To provide contemporary Australian data on the public's training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and awareness of hands-only CPR. Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey in April 2016 of adult residents of the Australian state of Victoria was conducted. Primary outcomes were rates of CPR training and awareness of hands-only CPR. Results: Of the 404 adults surveyed (mean age 55 ± 17 years, 59% female, 73% metropolitan residents), 274 (68%) had undergone CPR training. Only 50% (n = 201) had heard of hands-only CPR, with most citing first-aid courses (41%) and media (36%) as sources of information. Of those who had undergone training, the majority had received training more than 5 years previously (52%) and only 28% had received training or refreshed training in the past 12 months. Most received training in a formal first-aid class (43%), and received training as a requirement for work (67%). The most common reasons for not having training were: they had never thought about it (59%), did not have time (25%) and did not know where to learn (15%). Compared to standard CPR, a greater proportion of respondents were willing to provide hands-only CPR for strangers (67% vs 86%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: From an Australian perspective, there is still room for improvement in CPR training rates and awareness of hands-only CPR. Further promotion of hands-only CPR and self-instruction (e.g. DVD kits or online) may see further improvements in CPR training and bystander CPR rates. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50812 10.1111/1742-6723.12720 restricted
spellingShingle Bray, Janet
Smith, K.
Case, R.
Cartledge, S.
Straney, L.
Finn, J.
Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians
title Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians
title_full Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians
title_fullStr Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians
title_full_unstemmed Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians
title_short Public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A cross-sectional survey of Victorians
title_sort public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training rates and awareness of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a cross-sectional survey of victorians
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50812