Variation in adenoma detection rate and the lifetime benefits and cost of colorectal cancer screening: A microsimulation model
Importance: Colonoscopy is the most commonly used colorectal cancer screening test in the United States. Its quality, as measured by adenoma detection rates (ADRs), varies widely among physicians, with unknown consequences for the cost and benefits of screening programs. Objective: To estimate the l...
| Main Authors: | Meester, R., Doubeni, C., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, Jensen, C., Van Der Meulen, M., Levin, T., Quinn, V., Schottinger, J., Zauber, A., Corley, D., Van Ballegooijen, M. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49967 |
Similar Items
A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: The role of assumptions about adenoma progression
by: Kuntz, K., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Kuntz, K., et al.
Published: (2011)
Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2015)
Public health impact of achieving 80% colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2015)
Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2016)
Nonbleeding adenomas: Evidence of systematic false-negative fecal immunochemical test results and their implications for screening effectiveness - A modeling study
by: Van Der Meulen, M., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Van Der Meulen, M., et al.
Published: (2016)
Developing a score chart to improve risk stratification of patients with colorectal adenoma
by: Van Heijningen, E., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Van Heijningen, E., et al.
Published: (2016)
Calibrating Parameters for Microsimulation Disease Models
by: Van Der Steen, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Van Der Steen, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening?: A cost-effectiveness analysis
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2014)
Development of new non-invasive tests for colorectal cancer screening: The relevance of information on adenoma detection
by: Haug, U., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Haug, U., et al.
Published: (2015)
Adherence to surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomas: A large, community-based study
by: van Heijningen, E., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: van Heijningen, E., et al.
Published: (2015)
Features of adenoma and colonoscopy associated with recurrent colorectal neoplasia based on a large community-based study
by: Van Heijningen, E., et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Van Heijningen, E., et al.
Published: (2013)
Contribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2012)
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2012)
Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN national CT colonography trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations
by: Vanness, D., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Vanness, D., et al.
Published: (2011)
The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening: The case of the Netherlands
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2015)
Gender Differences in Fecal Immunochemical Test Performance for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia
by: Kapidzic, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Kapidzic, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
Harms, benefits and costs of fecal immunochemical testing versus guaiac fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2017)
Validation of Models Used to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
by: Rutter, C., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Rutter, C., et al.
Published: (2015)
The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
Colorectal cancer screening in Australia
by: Kuipers, E., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Kuipers, E., et al.
Published: (2017)
Optimal colorectal cancer screening in states' low-income, uninsured populations - The case of South Carolina
by: Van Der Steen, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Van Der Steen, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
Personalizing Colonoscopy Screening for Elderly Individuals Based on Screening History, Cancer Risk, and Comorbidity Status Could Increase Cost Effectiveness
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2015)
Clarifying differences in natural history between models of screening: The case of colorectal cancer
by: Van Ballegooijen, M., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Van Ballegooijen, M., et al.
Published: (2011)
Cost-savings to medicare from pre-medicare colorectal cancer screening
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
How much colonoscopy screening should be recommended to individuals with various degrees of family history of colorectal cancer?
by: Wilschut, J., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Wilschut, J., et al.
Published: (2011)
The appropriateness of more intensive colonoscopy screening than recommended in medicare beneficiaries: A modeling study
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Van Hees, F., et al.
Published: (2014)
Investigation into the controversial association of Streptococcus gallolyticus with colorectal cancer and adenoma.
by: Abdulamir, Ahmed Sahib, et al.
Published: (2009)
by: Abdulamir, Ahmed Sahib, et al.
Published: (2009)
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2011)
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Introduction
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2012)
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2012)
State disparities in colorectal cancer rates: Contributions of risk factors, screening, and survival differences
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, et al.
Published: (2015)
Estimation of benefits, burden, and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: Modeling study for the US preventive services Task Force
by: Knudsen, A., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Knudsen, A., et al.
Published: (2016)
Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Goede, S., et al.
Published: (2013)
Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths
by: Zauber, A., et al.
Published: (2012)
by: Zauber, A., et al.
Published: (2012)
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening
by: Wilschut, J., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Wilschut, J., et al.
Published: (2011)
The Impact of Uncertainty in Barrett's Esophagus Progression Rates on Hypothetical Screening and Treatment Decisions
by: Kroep, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Kroep, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
Cost effectiveness of surveillance for GI cancers
by: Omidvari, A., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Omidvari, A., et al.
Published: (2016)
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer
by: Gini, A., et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Gini, A., et al.
Published: (2018)
Family history and the natural history of colorectal cancer: Systematic review
by: Henrikson, N., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Henrikson, N., et al.
Published: (2015)
Attendance and diagnostic yield of repeated two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer
by: Kapidzic, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Kapidzic, A., et al.
Published: (2015)
An Accurate Cancer Incidence in Barrett's Esophagus: A Best Estimate Using Published Data and Modeling
by: Kroep, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Kroep, S., et al.
Published: (2015)
Colorectal cancer mortality prevented by use and attributable to nonuse of colonoscopy
by: Stock, C., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Stock, C., et al.
Published: (2011)
Similar Items
-
A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: The role of assumptions about adenoma progression
by: Kuntz, K., et al.
Published: (2011) -
Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Public health impact of achieving 80% colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test
by: Meester, R., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Nonbleeding adenomas: Evidence of systematic false-negative fecal immunochemical test results and their implications for screening effectiveness - A modeling study
by: Van Der Meulen, M., et al.
Published: (2016)