Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism

Human consumption patterns exceed planetary boundaries and stress on the biosphere can be expected to worsen. The recent "Paris Agreement" (COP21) represents a major international attempt to address risk associated with climate change through rapid decarbonisation. The mechanisms for imple...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomson, G., Newman, Peter
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49926
_version_ 1848758351855353856
author Thomson, G.
Newman, Peter
author_facet Thomson, G.
Newman, Peter
author_sort Thomson, G.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Human consumption patterns exceed planetary boundaries and stress on the biosphere can be expected to worsen. The recent "Paris Agreement" (COP21) represents a major international attempt to address risk associated with climate change through rapid decarbonisation. The mechanisms for implementation are yet to be determined and, while various large-scale geoengineering projects have been proposed, we argue a better solution may lie in cities. Large-scale green urbanism in cities and their bioregions would offer benefits commensurate to alternative geoengineering proposals, but this integrated approach carries less risk and has additional, multiple, social and economic benefits in addition to a reduction of urban ecological footprint. However, the key to success will require policy writers and city makers to deliver at scale and to high urban sustainability performance benchmarks. To better define urban sustainability performance, we describe three horizons of green urbanism: green design, that seeks to improve upon conventional development; sustainable development, that is the first step toward a net zero impact; and the emerging concept of regenerative urbanism, that enables biosphere repair. Examples of green urbanism exist that utilize technology and design to optimize urban metabolism and deliver net positive sustainability performance. If mainstreamed, regenerative approaches can make urban development a major urban geoengineering force, while simultaneously introducing life-affirming co-benefits to burgeoning cities.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:42:37Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-49926
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:42:37Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-499262017-09-13T15:37:42Z Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism Thomson, G. Newman, Peter Human consumption patterns exceed planetary boundaries and stress on the biosphere can be expected to worsen. The recent "Paris Agreement" (COP21) represents a major international attempt to address risk associated with climate change through rapid decarbonisation. The mechanisms for implementation are yet to be determined and, while various large-scale geoengineering projects have been proposed, we argue a better solution may lie in cities. Large-scale green urbanism in cities and their bioregions would offer benefits commensurate to alternative geoengineering proposals, but this integrated approach carries less risk and has additional, multiple, social and economic benefits in addition to a reduction of urban ecological footprint. However, the key to success will require policy writers and city makers to deliver at scale and to high urban sustainability performance benchmarks. To better define urban sustainability performance, we describe three horizons of green urbanism: green design, that seeks to improve upon conventional development; sustainable development, that is the first step toward a net zero impact; and the emerging concept of regenerative urbanism, that enables biosphere repair. Examples of green urbanism exist that utilize technology and design to optimize urban metabolism and deliver net positive sustainability performance. If mainstreamed, regenerative approaches can make urban development a major urban geoengineering force, while simultaneously introducing life-affirming co-benefits to burgeoning cities. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49926 10.3390/geosciences6040046 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Thomson, G.
Newman, Peter
Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
title Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
title_full Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
title_fullStr Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
title_full_unstemmed Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
title_short Geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
title_sort geoengineering in the anthropocene through regenerative urbanism
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49926