Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study

Background: Surveillance in patients with previous polypectomy was underused in the Medicare population in 1994. This study investigates whether expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has reduced the inappropriate use of surveillance. Methods: We used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris, Fedewa, S., Lin, C., Virgo, K., Jemal, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49838
_version_ 1848758327633248256
author Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris
Fedewa, S.
Lin, C.
Virgo, K.
Jemal, A.
author_facet Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris
Fedewa, S.
Lin, C.
Virgo, K.
Jemal, A.
author_sort Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Surveillance in patients with previous polypectomy was underused in the Medicare population in 1994. This study investigates whether expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has reduced the inappropriate use of surveillance. Methods: We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate time to surveillance and polyp recurrence rates for Medicare beneficiaries with a colonoscopy with polypectomy between 1998 and 2003 who were followed through 2008 for receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate risk factors for: 1) failing to undergo surveillance and 2) polyp recurrence among these individuals. Analyses were stratified into three 2-year cohorts based on baseline colonoscopy date. Results: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a colonoscopy with polypectomy in the 1998–1999 (n = 4,136), 2000–2001 (n = 3,538) and 2002–2003 (n = 4,655) cohorts had respective probabilities of 30%, 26% and 20% (p<0.001) of subsequent surveillance events within 3 years. At the same time, 58%, 52% and 45% (p<0.001) of beneficiaries received a surveillance event within 5 years. Polyp recurrence rates after 5 years were 36%, 30% and 26% (p<0.001) respectively. Older age (≥ 70 years), female gender, later cohort (2000–2001 & 2002–2003), and severe comorbidity were the most important risk factors for failure to undergo a surveillance event. Male gender and early cohort (1998–1999) were the most important risk factors for polyp recurrence. Conclusions: Expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has not reduced underutilization of surveillance in the Medicare population. It is important to take action now to improve this situation, because polyp recurrence is substantial in this population.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:42:14Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-49838
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:42:14Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-498382017-09-13T15:37:23Z Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris Fedewa, S. Lin, C. Virgo, K. Jemal, A. Background: Surveillance in patients with previous polypectomy was underused in the Medicare population in 1994. This study investigates whether expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has reduced the inappropriate use of surveillance. Methods: We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate time to surveillance and polyp recurrence rates for Medicare beneficiaries with a colonoscopy with polypectomy between 1998 and 2003 who were followed through 2008 for receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate risk factors for: 1) failing to undergo surveillance and 2) polyp recurrence among these individuals. Analyses were stratified into three 2-year cohorts based on baseline colonoscopy date. Results: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a colonoscopy with polypectomy in the 1998–1999 (n = 4,136), 2000–2001 (n = 3,538) and 2002–2003 (n = 4,655) cohorts had respective probabilities of 30%, 26% and 20% (p<0.001) of subsequent surveillance events within 3 years. At the same time, 58%, 52% and 45% (p<0.001) of beneficiaries received a surveillance event within 5 years. Polyp recurrence rates after 5 years were 36%, 30% and 26% (p<0.001) respectively. Older age (≥ 70 years), female gender, later cohort (2000–2001 & 2002–2003), and severe comorbidity were the most important risk factors for failure to undergo a surveillance event. Male gender and early cohort (1998–1999) were the most important risk factors for polyp recurrence. Conclusions: Expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has not reduced underutilization of surveillance in the Medicare population. It is important to take action now to improve this situation, because polyp recurrence is substantial in this population. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49838 10.1371/journal.pone.0110937 Public Library of Science unknown
spellingShingle Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris
Fedewa, S.
Lin, C.
Virgo, K.
Jemal, A.
Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study
title Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study
title_full Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study
title_fullStr Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study
title_short Utilization of surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare population - A cohort study
title_sort utilization of surveillance after polypectomy in the medicare population - a cohort study
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49838