Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar

Multi-beam (swath) sonar systems provide the capability to ensonify an entire aggregation of fish in a single pass. However, estimation of abundance and discrimination between species via the use of target strength are considerably more complex than using traditional echosounders, because they enson...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parsons, Miles, Parnum, Iain, McCauley, Robert
Format: Journal Article
Published: Australian Acousticial Society 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49358
_version_ 1848758224092659712
author Parsons, Miles
Parnum, Iain
McCauley, Robert
author_facet Parsons, Miles
Parnum, Iain
McCauley, Robert
author_sort Parsons, Miles
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Multi-beam (swath) sonar systems provide the capability to ensonify an entire aggregation of fish in a single pass. However, estimation of abundance and discrimination between species via the use of target strength are considerably more complex than using traditional echosounders, because they ensonify targets at a much wider range of incidence angles. The beam pattern and along beam resolution of multi-beam swaths can produce individual sample volumes that are of similarmagnitude to an individual fish (particularly for large fish, say >1m in length). If individual fish can be resolved, (either as a single fish within a sample, or as multiple contiguous samples that delineate a single fish), and if one assumes that this situation applies to the whole school, acoustic packing density can be determined by dividing the volume of the school by the number of detected acoustic targets. This estimate is proportional to the actual packing density of the fish, defined asthe number of fish per unit volume of water. Acoustic backscatter of fish from a number of schools comprising different species were collected off Perth, in 2005 and 2007, using a Reson Seabat 8125 and 7125 respectively. Nearest neighbour distances of between 1 and 3 body lengths were observed and packing density of acoustic targets showed distinct variation between some species. However, schools of the same species also displayed different acoustic packing densities at differentstages of their growth and development. Such differences were more difficult to observe in schools of fewer fish because the variations in packing density had less impact on the overall volume of the smaller schools associated with fewer fish. Therefore discrimination between species was only deemed possible when surveying two species of different sized fish at the same time. Video ground truth data is recommended to confirm species composition whatever the type of schoolobserved.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:40:35Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-49358
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:40:35Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Australian Acousticial Society
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-493582017-05-23T02:33:17Z Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar Parsons, Miles Parnum, Iain McCauley, Robert aggregation echosounders multi-beam sonar systems Multi-beam (swath) sonar systems provide the capability to ensonify an entire aggregation of fish in a single pass. However, estimation of abundance and discrimination between species via the use of target strength are considerably more complex than using traditional echosounders, because they ensonify targets at a much wider range of incidence angles. The beam pattern and along beam resolution of multi-beam swaths can produce individual sample volumes that are of similarmagnitude to an individual fish (particularly for large fish, say >1m in length). If individual fish can be resolved, (either as a single fish within a sample, or as multiple contiguous samples that delineate a single fish), and if one assumes that this situation applies to the whole school, acoustic packing density can be determined by dividing the volume of the school by the number of detected acoustic targets. This estimate is proportional to the actual packing density of the fish, defined asthe number of fish per unit volume of water. Acoustic backscatter of fish from a number of schools comprising different species were collected off Perth, in 2005 and 2007, using a Reson Seabat 8125 and 7125 respectively. Nearest neighbour distances of between 1 and 3 body lengths were observed and packing density of acoustic targets showed distinct variation between some species. However, schools of the same species also displayed different acoustic packing densities at differentstages of their growth and development. Such differences were more difficult to observe in schools of fewer fish because the variations in packing density had less impact on the overall volume of the smaller schools associated with fewer fish. Therefore discrimination between species was only deemed possible when surveying two species of different sized fish at the same time. Video ground truth data is recommended to confirm species composition whatever the type of schoolobserved. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49358 Australian Acousticial Society fulltext
spellingShingle aggregation
echosounders
multi-beam
sonar systems
Parsons, Miles
Parnum, Iain
McCauley, Robert
Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
title Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
title_full Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
title_fullStr Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
title_short Quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
title_sort quantifying the acoustics packing density of fish schools with a multi-beam sonar
topic aggregation
echosounders
multi-beam
sonar systems
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49358