Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users
Aims: Determine the prevalence and frequency at which injecting drug users (IDU) continue to inject whilst incarcerated and to identify factors associated with in-prison injecting. Design: A nationally coordinated cross-sectional convenience sample. Participants: A total of 355 regular IDUs who had...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Informa Healthcare
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47926 |
| _version_ | 1848757968633331712 |
|---|---|
| author | Fetherston, James Carruthers, Susan Butler, Tony Wilson, David Sindicich, Natasha |
| author_facet | Fetherston, James Carruthers, Susan Butler, Tony Wilson, David Sindicich, Natasha |
| author_sort | Fetherston, James |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Aims: Determine the prevalence and frequency at which injecting drug users (IDU) continue to inject whilst incarcerated and to identify factors associated with in-prison injecting. Design: A nationally coordinated cross-sectional convenience sample. Participants: A total of 355 regular IDUs who had been imprisoned within the past 10 years. Measurements: Data concerning demographics, drug use history and injection whilst imprisoned were collected by participant self-report. Findings: Almost half, 46% (n = 162), of the participants reported that they had ever injected whilst imprisoned. Most of these (n = 150; 42% of all participants) reported injecting during their last imprisonment. Factors identified as significantly associated with prison injecting were being male, receiving income from criminal activity in the month prior to interview and length of last sentence. Frequency of injection varied from isolated instances to multiple times daily. Half (n = 75) of those who injected during their most recent imprisonment reported injecting at a lower frequency while incarcerated than they did in the month prior to survey. Two individuals reported initiation to injection during their most recent period of imprisonment. Conclusions: Most IDUs who experience imprisonment either suspend injecting whilst incarcerated or reduce the frequency at which they inject. However, injection is still common in Australian prisons, highlighting the need for continued harm-minimisation efforts with this population. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:36:31Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-47926 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:36:31Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Informa Healthcare |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-479262017-09-13T14:15:45Z Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users Fetherston, James Carruthers, Susan Butler, Tony Wilson, David Sindicich, Natasha prison Australia Injecting drug use Aims: Determine the prevalence and frequency at which injecting drug users (IDU) continue to inject whilst incarcerated and to identify factors associated with in-prison injecting. Design: A nationally coordinated cross-sectional convenience sample. Participants: A total of 355 regular IDUs who had been imprisoned within the past 10 years. Measurements: Data concerning demographics, drug use history and injection whilst imprisoned were collected by participant self-report. Findings: Almost half, 46% (n = 162), of the participants reported that they had ever injected whilst imprisoned. Most of these (n = 150; 42% of all participants) reported injecting during their last imprisonment. Factors identified as significantly associated with prison injecting were being male, receiving income from criminal activity in the month prior to interview and length of last sentence. Frequency of injection varied from isolated instances to multiple times daily. Half (n = 75) of those who injected during their most recent imprisonment reported injecting at a lower frequency while incarcerated than they did in the month prior to survey. Two individuals reported initiation to injection during their most recent period of imprisonment. Conclusions: Most IDUs who experience imprisonment either suspend injecting whilst incarcerated or reduce the frequency at which they inject. However, injection is still common in Australian prisons, highlighting the need for continued harm-minimisation efforts with this population. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47926 10.3109/14659891.2012.760008 Informa Healthcare restricted |
| spellingShingle | prison Australia Injecting drug use Fetherston, James Carruthers, Susan Butler, Tony Wilson, David Sindicich, Natasha Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users |
| title | Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users |
| title_full | Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users |
| title_fullStr | Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users |
| title_short | Rates of injection in prison in a sample of Australian injecting drug users |
| title_sort | rates of injection in prison in a sample of australian injecting drug users |
| topic | prison Australia Injecting drug use |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47926 |