Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"

This paper examines the ongoing dilemma of successfully integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education into classrooms, and considers how re-imaging the components of STEM could lead to more positive outcomes. The paper considers three alternative options for the E in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blackley, Susan, Sheffield, Rachel
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/10329/10258
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47431
_version_ 1848757830793822208
author Blackley, Susan
Sheffield, Rachel
author_facet Blackley, Susan
Sheffield, Rachel
author_sort Blackley, Susan
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper examines the ongoing dilemma of successfully integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education into classrooms, and considers how re-imaging the components of STEM could lead to more positive outcomes. The paper considers three alternative options for the E in STEM: Enquiry, Ethics, and Environment, and in each case we examine how this could be developed and integrated into the curriculum. Finally we investigate E for Engineering, as it was originally conceived in the acronym, and consider how this could be refined and developed to reflect the application of knowledge and the incorporation of 21st century skills. The implications are clear: teachers and policy makers must be innovative and imaginative to garner exciting STEM opportunities in order to equip future citizens with the necessary skills and strategies for a globally productive and informed future.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:34:20Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-47431
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:34:20Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-474312017-01-30T15:33:15Z Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering" Blackley, Susan Sheffield, Rachel This paper examines the ongoing dilemma of successfully integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education into classrooms, and considers how re-imaging the components of STEM could lead to more positive outcomes. The paper considers three alternative options for the E in STEM: Enquiry, Ethics, and Environment, and in each case we examine how this could be developed and integrated into the curriculum. Finally we investigate E for Engineering, as it was originally conceived in the acronym, and consider how this could be refined and developed to reflect the application of knowledge and the incorporation of 21st century skills. The implications are clear: teachers and policy makers must be innovative and imaginative to garner exciting STEM opportunities in order to equip future citizens with the necessary skills and strategies for a globally productive and informed future. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47431 http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/10329/10258 fulltext
spellingShingle Blackley, Susan
Sheffield, Rachel
Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"
title Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"
title_full Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"
title_fullStr Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"
title_full_unstemmed Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"
title_short Appraising the E in STEM education: Creative alternatives to "engineering"
title_sort appraising the e in stem education: creative alternatives to "engineering"
url http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/10329/10258
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47431