Ethical reasoning in clinical education

Ethical reasoning within the context of clinical education is explored using the casuistry approach to ethical decision-making through the layers of the Seedhouse ethical grid (a decision-making tool). The casuistry approach guides clinicians’ actions by encouraging them to map previous experiences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quail, Michelle, Sanderson, Brooke, Leitão, Suze
Format: Journal Article
Published: Speech Pathology Australia 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/publications/jcpslp
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47400
_version_ 1848757822219616256
author Quail, Michelle
Sanderson, Brooke
Leitão, Suze
author_facet Quail, Michelle
Sanderson, Brooke
Leitão, Suze
author_sort Quail, Michelle
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Ethical reasoning within the context of clinical education is explored using the casuistry approach to ethical decision-making through the layers of the Seedhouse ethical grid (a decision-making tool). The casuistry approach guides clinicians’ actions by encouraging them to map previous experiences onto the profession’s underlying principles in order to help them proactively plan for future clinical education experiences. In this paper, we present a model which highlights the unique and delicate balance between the multiple stakeholders involved in clinical education, and the shift in responsibilities and relationships that can occur. The need to understand ethical decision-making processes, be proactive with ethical thinking, and ensure clarity in expectations is discussed. A framework is proposed to assist clinical educators in finding the balance between their ethical obligations to their students, their clients and themselves.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:34:12Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-47400
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:34:12Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Speech Pathology Australia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-474002017-01-30T15:33:03Z Ethical reasoning in clinical education Quail, Michelle Sanderson, Brooke Leitão, Suze casuitry clinical education ethics ethical grid Ethical reasoning within the context of clinical education is explored using the casuistry approach to ethical decision-making through the layers of the Seedhouse ethical grid (a decision-making tool). The casuistry approach guides clinicians’ actions by encouraging them to map previous experiences onto the profession’s underlying principles in order to help them proactively plan for future clinical education experiences. In this paper, we present a model which highlights the unique and delicate balance between the multiple stakeholders involved in clinical education, and the shift in responsibilities and relationships that can occur. The need to understand ethical decision-making processes, be proactive with ethical thinking, and ensure clarity in expectations is discussed. A framework is proposed to assist clinical educators in finding the balance between their ethical obligations to their students, their clients and themselves. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47400 http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/publications/jcpslp Speech Pathology Australia restricted
spellingShingle casuitry
clinical education
ethics
ethical grid
Quail, Michelle
Sanderson, Brooke
Leitão, Suze
Ethical reasoning in clinical education
title Ethical reasoning in clinical education
title_full Ethical reasoning in clinical education
title_fullStr Ethical reasoning in clinical education
title_full_unstemmed Ethical reasoning in clinical education
title_short Ethical reasoning in clinical education
title_sort ethical reasoning in clinical education
topic casuitry
clinical education
ethics
ethical grid
url http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/publications/jcpslp
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47400