The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suhardjanto, D., Tower, Greg, Brown, Alistair
Format: Journal Article
Published: The Clute Institute for Academic Research 2008
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47215
_version_ 1848757773203931136
author Suhardjanto, D.
Tower, Greg
Brown, Alistair
author_facet Suhardjanto, D.
Tower, Greg
Brown, Alistair
author_sort Suhardjanto, D.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:33:25Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-47215
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:33:25Z
publishDate 2008
publisher The Clute Institute for Academic Research
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-472152017-02-28T01:48:19Z The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items Suhardjanto, D. Tower, Greg Brown, Alistair 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47215 The Clute Institute for Academic Research restricted
spellingShingle Suhardjanto, D.
Tower, Greg
Brown, Alistair
The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
title The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
title_full The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
title_fullStr The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
title_full_unstemmed The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
title_short The fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
title_sort fallacy of assuming equality: evidence showing vastly different weighting of the global reporting initiative's key items
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47215