Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques

When assessing latent fingermark development methods, forensic researchers commonly evaluate treated samples using a grading scale. However, the subjective nature of these evaluation methods leaves the results of such investigations open to criticism for potential grader bias. Assessment of fingerma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fritz, Patrick, Frick, Amanda, Van Bronswijk, Wilhelm, Lewis, Simon, Beaudoin, A., Bleay, S., Lennard, C.
Format: Journal Article
Published: International association of identification 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46811
_version_ 1848757663934971904
author Fritz, Patrick
Frick, Amanda
Van Bronswijk, Wilhelm
Lewis, Simon
Beaudoin, A.
Bleay, S.
Lennard, C.
author_facet Fritz, Patrick
Frick, Amanda
Van Bronswijk, Wilhelm
Lewis, Simon
Beaudoin, A.
Bleay, S.
Lennard, C.
author_sort Fritz, Patrick
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description When assessing latent fingermark development methods, forensic researchers commonly evaluate treated samples using a grading scale. However, the subjective nature of these evaluation methods leaves the results of such investigations open to criticism for potential grader bias. Assessment of fingermark development quality is ultimately dependent on an individual's background and experience. A pilot study was conducted as a preliminary stage of a large-scale international collaboration. A set of 80 fingermark samples was developed with 1,2-indanedione-zinc chloride. Grades for photographic images of the developed fingermarks were assigned independently by 11 fingermark researchers. Sixty-seven percent of the scores given to each individual sample were the same as the median grade, and 99% of the scores were within 1 grade. The researchers were also assessed on their consistency by including 20 duplicate images to be graded. Seventy-eight percent of the grades given were identical to their original scores. These results indicate that a small group of independent fingermark graders is sufficient to produce reliable and consistent data in projects requiring the assessment of fingermark quality.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:31:41Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-46811
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:31:41Z
publishDate 2015
publisher International association of identification
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-468112017-01-30T15:29:22Z Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques Fritz, Patrick Frick, Amanda Van Bronswijk, Wilhelm Lewis, Simon Beaudoin, A. Bleay, S. Lennard, C. When assessing latent fingermark development methods, forensic researchers commonly evaluate treated samples using a grading scale. However, the subjective nature of these evaluation methods leaves the results of such investigations open to criticism for potential grader bias. Assessment of fingermark development quality is ultimately dependent on an individual's background and experience. A pilot study was conducted as a preliminary stage of a large-scale international collaboration. A set of 80 fingermark samples was developed with 1,2-indanedione-zinc chloride. Grades for photographic images of the developed fingermarks were assigned independently by 11 fingermark researchers. Sixty-seven percent of the scores given to each individual sample were the same as the median grade, and 99% of the scores were within 1 grade. The researchers were also assessed on their consistency by including 20 duplicate images to be graded. Seventy-eight percent of the grades given were identical to their original scores. These results indicate that a small group of independent fingermark graders is sufficient to produce reliable and consistent data in projects requiring the assessment of fingermark quality. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46811 International association of identification fulltext
spellingShingle Fritz, Patrick
Frick, Amanda
Van Bronswijk, Wilhelm
Lewis, Simon
Beaudoin, A.
Bleay, S.
Lennard, C.
Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
title Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
title_full Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
title_fullStr Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
title_full_unstemmed Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
title_short Variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
title_sort variability and subjectivity in the grading process for evaluating the performance of latent fingermark detection techniques
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46811