The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds

BACKGROUND: Despite broad public support and legislative activity, policies intended to promote physical activity in schools have not produced positive outcomes in levels of physical activity or student health. What explains the broad failure of Physical Activity Policies (PAPs)? Thus far, PAP resea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Howie, Erin, Stevick, E.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46497
_version_ 1848757574900383744
author Howie, Erin
Stevick, E.
author_facet Howie, Erin
Stevick, E.
author_sort Howie, Erin
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description BACKGROUND: Despite broad public support and legislative activity, policies intended to promote physical activity in schools have not produced positive outcomes in levels of physical activity or student health. What explains the broad failure of Physical Activity Policies (PAPs)? Thus far, PAP research has used limited quantitative methods to assess PAP outcomes. New paradigms of qualitative policy implementation research can make important contributions to explaining the causes of policy failure and to the future design of more efficacious PAP legislation. METHODS :This analysis is a case study of South Carolina's 2005 Student Health and Fitness Act (SHFA). Written documents, investigators' observation and experience, and an interview with a key stakeholder were analyzed to for themes based on theoretical frameworks from education implementation research including (1) bottom-up and top-down perspectives, (2) conceptualizing policy as practice, and (3) the implementer as learner. RESULTS: “Weak policy signals” in SHFA undermined the implementation of PAP in 3 problematic areas: inadequate capacity development for implementers, inappropriate measures of implementation, and insufficient funding. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the contributions of qualitative research and establish the need for further qualitative research into PAP implementation processes. To ensure successful future physical activity policies, policymakers, and stakeholders need to consider implementation, evaluation, and funding from the beginning phases of policy development.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:30:16Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-46497
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:30:16Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-464972019-02-19T05:35:06Z The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds Howie, Erin Stevick, E. qualitative research health policy physical activity BACKGROUND: Despite broad public support and legislative activity, policies intended to promote physical activity in schools have not produced positive outcomes in levels of physical activity or student health. What explains the broad failure of Physical Activity Policies (PAPs)? Thus far, PAP research has used limited quantitative methods to assess PAP outcomes. New paradigms of qualitative policy implementation research can make important contributions to explaining the causes of policy failure and to the future design of more efficacious PAP legislation. METHODS :This analysis is a case study of South Carolina's 2005 Student Health and Fitness Act (SHFA). Written documents, investigators' observation and experience, and an interview with a key stakeholder were analyzed to for themes based on theoretical frameworks from education implementation research including (1) bottom-up and top-down perspectives, (2) conceptualizing policy as practice, and (3) the implementer as learner. RESULTS: “Weak policy signals” in SHFA undermined the implementation of PAP in 3 problematic areas: inadequate capacity development for implementers, inappropriate measures of implementation, and insufficient funding. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the contributions of qualitative research and establish the need for further qualitative research into PAP implementation processes. To ensure successful future physical activity policies, policymakers, and stakeholders need to consider implementation, evaluation, and funding from the beginning phases of policy development. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46497 10.1111/josh.12182 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc fulltext
spellingShingle qualitative research
health policy
physical activity
Howie, Erin
Stevick, E.
The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds
title The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds
title_full The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds
title_fullStr The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds
title_full_unstemmed The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds
title_short The ‘‘Ins’’ and ‘‘Outs’’ of Physical Activity Policy Implementation: Inadequate Capacity,Inappropriate Outcome Measures, and Insufficient Funds
title_sort ‘‘ins’’ and ‘‘outs’’ of physical activity policy implementation: inadequate capacity,inappropriate outcome measures, and insufficient funds
topic qualitative research
health policy
physical activity
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46497