The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial

Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with specific language impairment. Method: A double-blind superiority trial with cluster randomization was used to compare a cueing procedure, designed to elicit a correct production following an initial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith-Lock, K., Leitao, Suze, Prior, P., Nickels, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46184
_version_ 1848757488367697920
author Smith-Lock, K.
Leitao, Suze
Prior, P.
Nickels, L.
author_facet Smith-Lock, K.
Leitao, Suze
Prior, P.
Nickels, L.
author_sort Smith-Lock, K.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with specific language impairment. Method: A double-blind superiority trial with cluster randomization was used to compare a cueing procedure, designed to elicit a correct production following an initial error, to a recasting procedure, which required no further production. Thirty-one 5-year-old children with specific language impairment participated in 8 small group, classroom-based treatment sessions. Fourteen children received the cueing approach and 17 received the recasting approach. Results: The cueing group made significantly more progress over the 8-week treatment period than the recasting group. There was a medium–large treatment effect in the cueing group and a negligible effect size in the recasting group. The groups did not differ in maintenance of treatment effects 8 weeks after treatment. In single-subject analyses, 50% of children in the cueing group and 12% in the recasting group showed a significant treatment effect. Half of these children maintained the treatment effect 8 weeks later. Conclusion: Treatment that used a structured cueing hierarchy designed to elicit a correct production following a child’s error resulted in significantly greater improvement in expressive grammar than treatment that provided a recast following an error.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:28:53Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-46184
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:28:53Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-461842017-09-13T14:30:06Z The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial Smith-Lock, K. Leitao, Suze Prior, P. Nickels, L. Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with specific language impairment. Method: A double-blind superiority trial with cluster randomization was used to compare a cueing procedure, designed to elicit a correct production following an initial error, to a recasting procedure, which required no further production. Thirty-one 5-year-old children with specific language impairment participated in 8 small group, classroom-based treatment sessions. Fourteen children received the cueing approach and 17 received the recasting approach. Results: The cueing group made significantly more progress over the 8-week treatment period than the recasting group. There was a medium–large treatment effect in the cueing group and a negligible effect size in the recasting group. The groups did not differ in maintenance of treatment effects 8 weeks after treatment. In single-subject analyses, 50% of children in the cueing group and 12% in the recasting group showed a significant treatment effect. Half of these children maintained the treatment effect 8 weeks later. Conclusion: Treatment that used a structured cueing hierarchy designed to elicit a correct production following a child’s error resulted in significantly greater improvement in expressive grammar than treatment that provided a recast following an error. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46184 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0041 fulltext
spellingShingle Smith-Lock, K.
Leitao, Suze
Prior, P.
Nickels, L.
The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial
title The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial
title_full The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial
title_short The effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with SLI: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with sli: a randomized clinical trial
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46184