Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females

Single leg loading tests are used clinically to examine balance and loading strategies in individuals with lower limb pain. Interpretation of these tests is through pain responses and comparisons with the asymptomatic leg. The purpose of this study was to examine normal differences in trunk and pelv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edmondston, Stephen, Leo, Y., Trant, B., Vatna, R., Kendell, Michelle, Smith, Anne
Format: Journal Article
Published: Churchill Livingstone 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46171
_version_ 1848757484987088896
author Edmondston, Stephen
Leo, Y.
Trant, B.
Vatna, R.
Kendell, Michelle
Smith, Anne
author_facet Edmondston, Stephen
Leo, Y.
Trant, B.
Vatna, R.
Kendell, Michelle
Smith, Anne
author_sort Edmondston, Stephen
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Single leg loading tests are used clinically to examine balance and loading strategies in individuals with lower limb pain. Interpretation of these tests is through pain responses and comparisons with the asymptomatic leg. The purpose of this study was to examine normal differences in trunk and pelvic movement between legs during the single leg stand, single leg squat, hip hitch and hip drop tests, and to compare observational and quantitative assessments of trunk movement during the single leg squat test. Thirty-one asymptomatic females (age = 21.7 ± 3.1 years) performed each test in a random sequence and quantitative analysis of coronal plane trunk lean (magnitude and direction), and femoro-pelvic angle was conducted using photographic image analysis. Within- and between-side minimal significant differences (MD) for femoro-pelvic angle were defined for each test. All tests had excellent within-side reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.87–0.97, standard error of measurement (SEM) = 0.6–1.2°). The between-side MD for femoro-pelvic angle was 6.3, 6.5, 9.7, and 6.7° for the single leg stand, single leg squat, hip hitch and hip drop tests respectively. The magnitude of trunk lean was small, increased with test complexity and was not consistent in relation to the stance leg.Excellent agreement (87–93%) for the direction of trunk movement between observers, and between observational and quantitative analysis (80–96%) was established for the single leg squat test. The patterns of trunk motion, and thresholds for significant difference in femoro-pelvic angle established in this study, will assist the interpretation of single leg loading tests in individuals with lower limb pain disorders
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:28:50Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-46171
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:28:50Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Churchill Livingstone
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-461712017-09-13T15:52:51Z Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females Edmondston, Stephen Leo, Y. Trant, B. Vatna, R. Kendell, Michelle Smith, Anne Single leg loading tests are used clinically to examine balance and loading strategies in individuals with lower limb pain. Interpretation of these tests is through pain responses and comparisons with the asymptomatic leg. The purpose of this study was to examine normal differences in trunk and pelvic movement between legs during the single leg stand, single leg squat, hip hitch and hip drop tests, and to compare observational and quantitative assessments of trunk movement during the single leg squat test. Thirty-one asymptomatic females (age = 21.7 ± 3.1 years) performed each test in a random sequence and quantitative analysis of coronal plane trunk lean (magnitude and direction), and femoro-pelvic angle was conducted using photographic image analysis. Within- and between-side minimal significant differences (MD) for femoro-pelvic angle were defined for each test. All tests had excellent within-side reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.87–0.97, standard error of measurement (SEM) = 0.6–1.2°). The between-side MD for femoro-pelvic angle was 6.3, 6.5, 9.7, and 6.7° for the single leg stand, single leg squat, hip hitch and hip drop tests respectively. The magnitude of trunk lean was small, increased with test complexity and was not consistent in relation to the stance leg.Excellent agreement (87–93%) for the direction of trunk movement between observers, and between observational and quantitative analysis (80–96%) was established for the single leg squat test. The patterns of trunk motion, and thresholds for significant difference in femoro-pelvic angle established in this study, will assist the interpretation of single leg loading tests in individuals with lower limb pain disorders 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46171 10.1016/j.math.2012.10.010 Churchill Livingstone restricted
spellingShingle Edmondston, Stephen
Leo, Y.
Trant, B.
Vatna, R.
Kendell, Michelle
Smith, Anne
Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
title Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
title_full Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
title_fullStr Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
title_full_unstemmed Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
title_short Symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
title_sort symmetry of trunk and femoro-pelvic movement respones to single leg loading tests in asymptomatic females
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46171