Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids

© 2014 The Authors. This paper presents chemical composition and aquatic toxicity characteristics of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids (NAs). Naphthenic acids are derived from the refining of petroleum middle distillates and can contribute to refinery effluent toxicity. NAs are also present in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swigert, J., Lee, C., Wong, D., White, R., Scarlett, Alan, West, C., Rowland, S.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4605
_version_ 1848744563625164800
author Swigert, J.
Lee, C.
Wong, D.
White, R.
Scarlett, Alan
West, C.
Rowland, S.
author_facet Swigert, J.
Lee, C.
Wong, D.
White, R.
Scarlett, Alan
West, C.
Rowland, S.
author_sort Swigert, J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2014 The Authors. This paper presents chemical composition and aquatic toxicity characteristics of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids (NAs). Naphthenic acids are derived from the refining of petroleum middle distillates and can contribute to refinery effluent toxicity. NAs are also present in oil sands process-affected water (OSPW), but differences in the NAs compositions from these sources precludes using a common aquatic toxicity dataset to represent the aquatic hazards of NAs from both origins. Our chemical characterization of a commercial sample of NAs showed it to contain in order of abundance, 1-ring>2-ring>acyclic>3-ring acids (~84%). Also present were monoaromatic acids (7%) and non-acids (9%, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and sulfur heterocyclic compounds). While the acyclic acids were only the third most abundant group, the five most abundant individual compounds were identified as C10-14 n-acids (n-decanoic acid to n-tetradecanoic acid). Aquatic toxicity testing of fish (Pimephales promelas), invertebrate (Daphnia magna), algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), and bacteria (Vibrio fischeri) showed P. promelas to be the most sensitive species with 96-h LL50=9.0mgL-1 (LC50=5.6mgL-1). Acute EL50 values for the other species ranged 24-46mgL-1 (EC50 values ranged 20-30mgL-1). Biomimetic extraction via solid-phase-microextraction (BE-SPME) suggested a nonpolar narcosis mode of toxic action for D. magna, P. subcapitata, and V. fischeri. The BE analysis under-predicted fish toxicity, which indicates that a specific mode of action, besides narcosis, may be a factor for fishes.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:03:27Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-4605
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:03:27Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-46052017-09-13T14:47:32Z Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids Swigert, J. Lee, C. Wong, D. White, R. Scarlett, Alan West, C. Rowland, S. © 2014 The Authors. This paper presents chemical composition and aquatic toxicity characteristics of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids (NAs). Naphthenic acids are derived from the refining of petroleum middle distillates and can contribute to refinery effluent toxicity. NAs are also present in oil sands process-affected water (OSPW), but differences in the NAs compositions from these sources precludes using a common aquatic toxicity dataset to represent the aquatic hazards of NAs from both origins. Our chemical characterization of a commercial sample of NAs showed it to contain in order of abundance, 1-ring>2-ring>acyclic>3-ring acids (~84%). Also present were monoaromatic acids (7%) and non-acids (9%, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and sulfur heterocyclic compounds). While the acyclic acids were only the third most abundant group, the five most abundant individual compounds were identified as C10-14 n-acids (n-decanoic acid to n-tetradecanoic acid). Aquatic toxicity testing of fish (Pimephales promelas), invertebrate (Daphnia magna), algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), and bacteria (Vibrio fischeri) showed P. promelas to be the most sensitive species with 96-h LL50=9.0mgL-1 (LC50=5.6mgL-1). Acute EL50 values for the other species ranged 24-46mgL-1 (EC50 values ranged 20-30mgL-1). Biomimetic extraction via solid-phase-microextraction (BE-SPME) suggested a nonpolar narcosis mode of toxic action for D. magna, P. subcapitata, and V. fischeri. The BE analysis under-predicted fish toxicity, which indicates that a specific mode of action, besides narcosis, may be a factor for fishes. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4605 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.052 unknown
spellingShingle Swigert, J.
Lee, C.
Wong, D.
White, R.
Scarlett, Alan
West, C.
Rowland, S.
Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
title Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
title_full Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
title_fullStr Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
title_full_unstemmed Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
title_short Aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
title_sort aquatic hazard assessment of a commercial sample of naphthenic acids
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4605