Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals

Aim: This paper is a report of a study conducted to compare the predictive accuracy for fallers of The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool, and to determine the inter-rater agreement of each tool. Background: Falls risk assessment is a key...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barker, A., Kamar, J., Graco, M., Lawler, V., Hill, Keith
Format: Journal Article
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46010
_version_ 1848757442458943488
author Barker, A.
Kamar, J.
Graco, M.
Lawler, V.
Hill, Keith
author_facet Barker, A.
Kamar, J.
Graco, M.
Lawler, V.
Hill, Keith
author_sort Barker, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: This paper is a report of a study conducted to compare the predictive accuracy for fallers of The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool, and to determine the inter-rater agreement of each tool. Background: Falls risk assessment is a key component of fall prevention. Investigation of clinimetric properties of a tool should be completed before it are used in clinical practice. Methods: Local falls data were used to inform modification of the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool to improve faller prediction. Clinimetric properties of the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool were examined in a prospective cross-sectional study with acute hospital patients. Phase I involved assessment of predictive accuracy using sensitivity, specificity and the Youden Index (J) with 263 patients. Phase II of the evaluation involved assessment of inter-rater agreement using the Kappa statistic (κ) with 52 patients. Data were collected in 2008. Results: Impaired balance, age 80 years and older and drug and alcohol problems were identified as additional falls risk factors in The Northern Hospital population and added to the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool. The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool had higher sensitivity (0•65 vs. 0•35, P = 0•016). The St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool had higher specificity (0•93 vs. 0•79, P = 0•000). The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool had the greater overall accuracy (J) (0•44 vs. 0•28, P = 0•006). Inter-rater agreement of The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool was fair (κ = 0•34) and low for the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool (κ = 0•19).Conclusion: The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool accurately identified patients at risk of falling. The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool was more accurate. Tools which have unknown validity and reliability should not be used. Future research is needed to provide evidence that use of falls risk assessments has a positive impact on reducing patient falls.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:28:10Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-46010
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:28:10Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-460102017-09-13T16:07:20Z Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals Barker, A. Kamar, J. Graco, M. Lawler, V. Hill, Keith Aim: This paper is a report of a study conducted to compare the predictive accuracy for fallers of The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool, and to determine the inter-rater agreement of each tool. Background: Falls risk assessment is a key component of fall prevention. Investigation of clinimetric properties of a tool should be completed before it are used in clinical practice. Methods: Local falls data were used to inform modification of the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool to improve faller prediction. Clinimetric properties of the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool were examined in a prospective cross-sectional study with acute hospital patients. Phase I involved assessment of predictive accuracy using sensitivity, specificity and the Youden Index (J) with 263 patients. Phase II of the evaluation involved assessment of inter-rater agreement using the Kappa statistic (κ) with 52 patients. Data were collected in 2008. Results: Impaired balance, age 80 years and older and drug and alcohol problems were identified as additional falls risk factors in The Northern Hospital population and added to the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool. The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool had higher sensitivity (0•65 vs. 0•35, P = 0•016). The St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool had higher specificity (0•93 vs. 0•79, P = 0•000). The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool had the greater overall accuracy (J) (0•44 vs. 0•28, P = 0•006). Inter-rater agreement of The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool was fair (κ = 0•34) and low for the St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool (κ = 0•19).Conclusion: The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool and St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool accurately identified patients at risk of falling. The Northern Hospital Modified St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool was more accurate. Tools which have unknown validity and reliability should not be used. Future research is needed to provide evidence that use of falls risk assessments has a positive impact on reducing patient falls. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46010 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05503.x Blackwell Publishing Ltd restricted
spellingShingle Barker, A.
Kamar, J.
Graco, M.
Lawler, V.
Hill, Keith
Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
title Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
title_full Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
title_fullStr Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
title_short Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
title_sort adding value to the stratify falls risk assessment in acute hospitals
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46010