Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives
Radiation therapists (RT) need to engage more in research for the benefit of their patients and their own professional development. However radiation therapy in Australia is new to research with an undeveloped research culture, so RTs need direction when wishing to embark upon research projects. Thi...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Australian Institute of Radiography
2009
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45340 |
| _version_ | 1848757255404519424 |
|---|---|
| author | Cox, J. Halkett, Georgia Anderson, C. |
| author_facet | Cox, J. Halkett, Georgia Anderson, C. |
| author_sort | Cox, J. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Radiation therapists (RT) need to engage more in research for the benefit of their patients and their own professional development. However radiation therapy in Australia is new to research with an undeveloped research culture, so RTs need direction when wishing to embark upon research projects. This project is the first stage of a Delphi process aimed at defining RT areas of research interest. Questionnaires were sent to all Australian Departments of Radiation Oncology (n=41) asking for a group in each department to identify what problems they experienced while treating patients or working with colleagues and what areas of radiation therapy they felt required further research by radiation therapists. The response rate was 70.7%. Of the representative RTs who collected the data, 82.8% had greater than 10 years experience and 48.1% had postgraduate qualifications. Two of the researchers categorised the responses and derived a list of themes to describe the identified questions. 374 of 410 research questions were codable (91.2%). The categories defined were Staff Issues (58.3%), Technical Issues (28.9%) and Patient Related Issues (12.9%). The RTs were interested in many research areas, but it is of concern that the largest theme identified was Staff Issues, which could indicate some dissatisfaction in the work place. However it is clear that RTs are thinking about their practice and identifying gaps in knowledge in the technical and patient related areas. The second stage of this project was to create research areas that represented the themes identified in this first stage and send them back to the radiation therapy departments for prioritising; this data is currently being analysed. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:25:11Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-45340 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:25:11Z |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publisher | Australian Institute of Radiography |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-453402017-01-30T15:20:19Z Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives Cox, J. Halkett, Georgia Anderson, C. Radiation therapists (RT) need to engage more in research for the benefit of their patients and their own professional development. However radiation therapy in Australia is new to research with an undeveloped research culture, so RTs need direction when wishing to embark upon research projects. This project is the first stage of a Delphi process aimed at defining RT areas of research interest. Questionnaires were sent to all Australian Departments of Radiation Oncology (n=41) asking for a group in each department to identify what problems they experienced while treating patients or working with colleagues and what areas of radiation therapy they felt required further research by radiation therapists. The response rate was 70.7%. Of the representative RTs who collected the data, 82.8% had greater than 10 years experience and 48.1% had postgraduate qualifications. Two of the researchers categorised the responses and derived a list of themes to describe the identified questions. 374 of 410 research questions were codable (91.2%). The categories defined were Staff Issues (58.3%), Technical Issues (28.9%) and Patient Related Issues (12.9%). The RTs were interested in many research areas, but it is of concern that the largest theme identified was Staff Issues, which could indicate some dissatisfaction in the work place. However it is clear that RTs are thinking about their practice and identifying gaps in knowledge in the technical and patient related areas. The second stage of this project was to create research areas that represented the themes identified in this first stage and send them back to the radiation therapy departments for prioritising; this data is currently being analysed. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45340 Australian Institute of Radiography fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Cox, J. Halkett, Georgia Anderson, C. Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| title | Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| title_full | Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| title_fullStr | Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| title_full_unstemmed | Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| title_short | Research interests identified at the coal-face: initial Delphi analysis of Australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| title_sort | research interests identified at the coal-face: initial delphi analysis of australian radiation therapists' perspectives |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45340 |