CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia

We investigate the extent to which the incentive alignment theory and the managerial power theory explain the variability of CFO compensation in Australia. We find a positive relationship between the level of CFO compensation and measures of job complexity and firm stock market performance. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duong, Lien, Evans, John
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45116
_version_ 1848757193401171968
author Duong, Lien
Evans, John
author_facet Duong, Lien
Evans, John
author_sort Duong, Lien
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description We investigate the extent to which the incentive alignment theory and the managerial power theory explain the variability of CFO compensation in Australia. We find a positive relationship between the level of CFO compensation and measures of job complexity and firm stock market performance. However, we do not find the pay-for-performance link when performance is measured at the CFO-specific level. CFOs actually receive higher non-cash compensation when reporting quality is lower, suggesting a sharp contrast to predictions of the incentive alignment approach. Conversely, we find that CFOs who have more managerial power (the CFO is on the board of directors, or holds a higher level of stock ownership, or stays longer in their position) receive significantly higher compensation. For example, a CFO who has board membership receives on average $323,590 more than the total compensation of a CFO who is not a board insider. Overall both theories are important in determining Australian CFO compensation but the managerial power hypothesis explains a larger fraction of variation in CFO pay than the incentive alignment view.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:24:12Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-45116
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:24:12Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-451162018-04-12T00:52:53Z CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia Duong, Lien Evans, John We investigate the extent to which the incentive alignment theory and the managerial power theory explain the variability of CFO compensation in Australia. We find a positive relationship between the level of CFO compensation and measures of job complexity and firm stock market performance. However, we do not find the pay-for-performance link when performance is measured at the CFO-specific level. CFOs actually receive higher non-cash compensation when reporting quality is lower, suggesting a sharp contrast to predictions of the incentive alignment approach. Conversely, we find that CFOs who have more managerial power (the CFO is on the board of directors, or holds a higher level of stock ownership, or stays longer in their position) receive significantly higher compensation. For example, a CFO who has board membership receives on average $323,590 more than the total compensation of a CFO who is not a board insider. Overall both theories are important in determining Australian CFO compensation but the managerial power hypothesis explains a larger fraction of variation in CFO pay than the incentive alignment view. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45116 10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.03.006 Elsevier fulltext
spellingShingle Duong, Lien
Evans, John
CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia
title CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia
title_full CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia
title_fullStr CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia
title_full_unstemmed CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia
title_short CFO Compensation: Evidence from Australia
title_sort cfo compensation: evidence from australia
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45116