Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football

In Australian football players are ‘bigger, stronger, faster and more skillful’ than at any time in the games history. The interchange system had increased the pace of the game by maintaining a faster game tempo for longer periods of time. As a consequence of the changes to the game over time, injur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McManus, Alexandra, Stevenson, M., Finch, C.
Other Authors: Professor Caroline Finch
Format: Conference Paper
Published: Sports Medicine Australia 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45014
_version_ 1848757164369248256
author McManus, Alexandra
Stevenson, M.
Finch, C.
author2 Professor Caroline Finch
author_facet Professor Caroline Finch
McManus, Alexandra
Stevenson, M.
Finch, C.
author_sort McManus, Alexandra
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In Australian football players are ‘bigger, stronger, faster and more skillful’ than at any time in the games history. The interchange system had increased the pace of the game by maintaining a faster game tempo for longer periods of time. As a consequence of the changes to the game over time, injury rates have increased dramatically, as have the severity of injuries. To minimise the risk of injury, training regimes should simulate the demands placed on players during games. This presentation will outline a study of non-elite Australian footballers that quantified the positional demands placed in non-elite players during games. Players from one non-elite club based in Perth, Australia were followed during a pre-season and season. A total of 416 hours of video taped footage was analysed. On average, players changed movements every 10 seconds and completed approximately 600 separate movements during a games. The average distance travelled during a game ranged from 13 kilometres (fullback) to 17.4 kilometres (wing). The results indicated that there were significant differences between the positional demands during games however the training sessions observed did not reflect these differences. For example, the centreline players performed significantly more high intensity movements than other players therefore would need additional training drills to adapt to the higher energy demands required during a game. This presentation will outline the significant differences between the positional demands of Australian footballers and provide recommendations for training regimes that better reflect these demands.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:23:44Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-45014
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:23:44Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Sports Medicine Australia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-450142017-01-30T15:17:48Z Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football McManus, Alexandra Stevenson, M. Finch, C. Professor Caroline Finch Australian football injury prevention time motion analysis In Australian football players are ‘bigger, stronger, faster and more skillful’ than at any time in the games history. The interchange system had increased the pace of the game by maintaining a faster game tempo for longer periods of time. As a consequence of the changes to the game over time, injury rates have increased dramatically, as have the severity of injuries. To minimise the risk of injury, training regimes should simulate the demands placed on players during games. This presentation will outline a study of non-elite Australian footballers that quantified the positional demands placed in non-elite players during games. Players from one non-elite club based in Perth, Australia were followed during a pre-season and season. A total of 416 hours of video taped footage was analysed. On average, players changed movements every 10 seconds and completed approximately 600 separate movements during a games. The average distance travelled during a game ranged from 13 kilometres (fullback) to 17.4 kilometres (wing). The results indicated that there were significant differences between the positional demands during games however the training sessions observed did not reflect these differences. For example, the centreline players performed significantly more high intensity movements than other players therefore would need additional training drills to adapt to the higher energy demands required during a game. This presentation will outline the significant differences between the positional demands of Australian footballers and provide recommendations for training regimes that better reflect these demands. 2005 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45014 Sports Medicine Australia restricted
spellingShingle Australian football
injury prevention
time motion analysis
McManus, Alexandra
Stevenson, M.
Finch, C.
Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football
title Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football
title_full Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football
title_fullStr Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football
title_full_unstemmed Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football
title_short Time-motion analysis: non-elite Australian football
title_sort time-motion analysis: non-elite australian football
topic Australian football
injury prevention
time motion analysis
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45014