Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience

Aims: Despite the guidelines, a "treatment gap" exists in the delivery of pharmacotherapy for secondary prevention. We aimed to analyze the trend in guideline-based medication usage following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) registry o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cole, J., Brennan, A., Ajani, A., Yan, B., Duffy, S., Loane, P., Reid, Christopher, Yudi, M., New, G., Black, A., Shaw, J., Clark, D., Andrianopoulos, N.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44961
_version_ 1848757149790896128
author Cole, J.
Brennan, A.
Ajani, A.
Yan, B.
Duffy, S.
Loane, P.
Reid, Christopher
Yudi, M.
New, G.
Black, A.
Shaw, J.
Clark, D.
Andrianopoulos, N.
author_facet Cole, J.
Brennan, A.
Ajani, A.
Yan, B.
Duffy, S.
Loane, P.
Reid, Christopher
Yudi, M.
New, G.
Black, A.
Shaw, J.
Clark, D.
Andrianopoulos, N.
author_sort Cole, J.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aims: Despite the guidelines, a "treatment gap" exists in the delivery of pharmacotherapy for secondary prevention. We aimed to analyze the trend in guideline-based medication usage following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) registry over a 6-year period (2005-2010). Methods: The MIG registry prospectively collects demographical, clinical, and procedural characteristics of consecutive patients undergoing PCI. We assessed medication use (aspirin, clopidogrel, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering agents) at 30 days and 12 months in patients alive and able to provide the information. Results: The cohort consists of 12,813 patients who underwent 14,787 consecutive interventional procedures. They comprised 76% males: 22% were elderly (=75 years), 23% had diabetes, 2% had severe renal impairment, 2% had severe left ventricular dysfunction, 26% presented with STEMI, and 44% of patients received drug-eluting stent. Follow-up was complete for 97.8% of the cohort at 30 days (2.2% mortality) and 89.1% at 12 months (4% mortality). From 2005 to 2010, the percentage of patients taking all five classes of medications increased each year. In 2010 at 30 days, nearly 60% of patients took all five classes of medications, and by 12 months, 75% of patients were taking four or five classes of medications. Conclusion: In conclusion, while the increasing use of cardiovascular medicines in an "at-risk" Australian cohort is encouraging, a treatment gap appears to still exist.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:23:30Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-44961
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:23:30Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-449612017-09-13T14:19:37Z Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience Cole, J. Brennan, A. Ajani, A. Yan, B. Duffy, S. Loane, P. Reid, Christopher Yudi, M. New, G. Black, A. Shaw, J. Clark, D. Andrianopoulos, N. Aims: Despite the guidelines, a "treatment gap" exists in the delivery of pharmacotherapy for secondary prevention. We aimed to analyze the trend in guideline-based medication usage following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) registry over a 6-year period (2005-2010). Methods: The MIG registry prospectively collects demographical, clinical, and procedural characteristics of consecutive patients undergoing PCI. We assessed medication use (aspirin, clopidogrel, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and lipid-lowering agents) at 30 days and 12 months in patients alive and able to provide the information. Results: The cohort consists of 12,813 patients who underwent 14,787 consecutive interventional procedures. They comprised 76% males: 22% were elderly (=75 years), 23% had diabetes, 2% had severe renal impairment, 2% had severe left ventricular dysfunction, 26% presented with STEMI, and 44% of patients received drug-eluting stent. Follow-up was complete for 97.8% of the cohort at 30 days (2.2% mortality) and 89.1% at 12 months (4% mortality). From 2005 to 2010, the percentage of patients taking all five classes of medications increased each year. In 2010 at 30 days, nearly 60% of patients took all five classes of medications, and by 12 months, 75% of patients were taking four or five classes of medications. Conclusion: In conclusion, while the increasing use of cardiovascular medicines in an "at-risk" Australian cohort is encouraging, a treatment gap appears to still exist. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44961 10.1111/1755-5922.12060 Blackwell Publishing Ltd unknown
spellingShingle Cole, J.
Brennan, A.
Ajani, A.
Yan, B.
Duffy, S.
Loane, P.
Reid, Christopher
Yudi, M.
New, G.
Black, A.
Shaw, J.
Clark, D.
Andrianopoulos, N.
Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience
title Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience
title_full Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience
title_fullStr Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience
title_short Cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: The Australian experience
title_sort cardiovascular medication use following percutaneous coronary intervention: the australian experience
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44961