The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal

To gauge the potential of seismic methods for the estimation of gas content in coal, the ultrasonic response of a sample saturated in turn with He, N2, CH4, and CO2 has been investigated. Specifically, traveltimes were used to determine P-wave velocity as a function of the difference between confini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lwin, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Published: Society of Exploration Geophysics 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44858
_version_ 1848757121845297152
author Lwin, Mark
author_facet Lwin, Mark
author_sort Lwin, Mark
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description To gauge the potential of seismic methods for the estimation of gas content in coal, the ultrasonic response of a sample saturated in turn with He, N2, CH4, and CO2 has been investigated. Specifically, traveltimes were used to determine P-wave velocity as a function of the difference between confining pressure and pore pressure. After crushing the sample to powder, adsorption isotherms for CO2 and CH4 were measured and then used to estimate the bulk densities, P-wave moduli, and impedances during the traveltime measurements. The data suggest a significant difference in density, P-wave modulus, and impedance under CO2 relative to CH4 saturation. Though these findings are based on the assumption that adsorption capacity of the sample when confined was similar to that measured after crushing, they are also roughly supported by isostatic strain measurements taken during swelling. Two possible causes of this behavior are, first, the mechanical properties of the adsorbed phase may be more liquid than gaslike. Second, the swelling of coal under confining pressure should lead to the closure of soft pores, thus stiffening the frame.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:23:04Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-44858
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:23:04Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Society of Exploration Geophysics
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-448582018-09-07T02:57:00Z The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal Lwin, Mark To gauge the potential of seismic methods for the estimation of gas content in coal, the ultrasonic response of a sample saturated in turn with He, N2, CH4, and CO2 has been investigated. Specifically, traveltimes were used to determine P-wave velocity as a function of the difference between confining pressure and pore pressure. After crushing the sample to powder, adsorption isotherms for CO2 and CH4 were measured and then used to estimate the bulk densities, P-wave moduli, and impedances during the traveltime measurements. The data suggest a significant difference in density, P-wave modulus, and impedance under CO2 relative to CH4 saturation. Though these findings are based on the assumption that adsorption capacity of the sample when confined was similar to that measured after crushing, they are also roughly supported by isostatic strain measurements taken during swelling. Two possible causes of this behavior are, first, the mechanical properties of the adsorbed phase may be more liquid than gaslike. Second, the swelling of coal under confining pressure should lead to the closure of soft pores, thus stiffening the frame. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44858 10.1190/geo2010-0206.1 Society of Exploration Geophysics fulltext
spellingShingle Lwin, Mark
The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
title The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
title_full The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
title_fullStr The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
title_short The effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
title_sort effect of different gases on the ultrasonic response of coal
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44858