Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury

Investigating the impact of incremental load magnitude on running joint power and kinematics is important for understanding the energy cost burden and potential injury-causative mechanisms associated with load carriage. It was hypothesized that incremental load magnitude would result in phase-specif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liew, B., Morris, Susan, Netto, Kevin
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44764
_version_ 1848757094855999488
author Liew, B.
Morris, Susan
Netto, Kevin
author_facet Liew, B.
Morris, Susan
Netto, Kevin
author_sort Liew, B.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Investigating the impact of incremental load magnitude on running joint power and kinematics is important for understanding the energy cost burden and potential injury-causative mechanisms associated with load carriage. It was hypothesized that incremental load magnitude would result in phase-specific, joint power and kinematic changes within the stance phase of running, and that these relationships would vary at different running velocities. Thirty-one participants performed running while carrying three load magnitudes (0%, 10%, 20% body weight), at three velocities (3, 4, 5 m/s). Lower limb trajectories and ground reaction forces were captured, and global optimization was used to derive the variables. The relationships between load magnitude and joint power and angle vectors, at each running velocity, were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping Canonical Correlation Analysis. Incremental load magnitude was positively correlated to joint power in the second half of stance. Increasing load magnitude was also positively correlated with alterations in three dimensional ankle angles during mid-stance (4.0 and 5.0 m/s), knee angles at mid-stance (at 5.0 m/s), and hip angles during toe-off (at all velocities). Post hoc analyses indicated that at faster running velocities (4.0 and 5.0 m/s), increasing load magnitude appeared to alter power contribution in a distal-to-proximal (ankle → hip) joint sequence from mid-stance to toe-off. In addition, kinematic changes due to increasing load influenced both sagittal and non-sagittal plane lower limb joint angles. This study provides a list of plausible factors that may influence running energy cost and injury risk during load carriage running.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:22:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-44764
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:22:38Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-447642017-09-13T14:15:05Z Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury Liew, B. Morris, Susan Netto, Kevin Investigating the impact of incremental load magnitude on running joint power and kinematics is important for understanding the energy cost burden and potential injury-causative mechanisms associated with load carriage. It was hypothesized that incremental load magnitude would result in phase-specific, joint power and kinematic changes within the stance phase of running, and that these relationships would vary at different running velocities. Thirty-one participants performed running while carrying three load magnitudes (0%, 10%, 20% body weight), at three velocities (3, 4, 5 m/s). Lower limb trajectories and ground reaction forces were captured, and global optimization was used to derive the variables. The relationships between load magnitude and joint power and angle vectors, at each running velocity, were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping Canonical Correlation Analysis. Incremental load magnitude was positively correlated to joint power in the second half of stance. Increasing load magnitude was also positively correlated with alterations in three dimensional ankle angles during mid-stance (4.0 and 5.0 m/s), knee angles at mid-stance (at 5.0 m/s), and hip angles during toe-off (at all velocities). Post hoc analyses indicated that at faster running velocities (4.0 and 5.0 m/s), increasing load magnitude appeared to alter power contribution in a distal-to-proximal (ankle → hip) joint sequence from mid-stance to toe-off. In addition, kinematic changes due to increasing load influenced both sagittal and non-sagittal plane lower limb joint angles. This study provides a list of plausible factors that may influence running energy cost and injury risk during load carriage running. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44764 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.014 Elsevier restricted
spellingShingle Liew, B.
Morris, Susan
Netto, Kevin
Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury
title Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury
title_full Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury
title_fullStr Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury
title_full_unstemmed Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury
title_short Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury
title_sort joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: implications for performance and injury
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44764