Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed?
It has been more than ten years since the publication of Hevner et al [1] and five years since Venable [2] surveyed editors and DSR researchers on standards and criteria for judging the quality and suitability of DSR submissions for publication. Since then, there has been much further discussion abo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Conference Paper |
| Published: |
Springer
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44435 |
| _version_ | 1848757000379301888 |
|---|---|
| author | Venable, John |
| author2 | Brian Donnellan |
| author_facet | Brian Donnellan Venable, John |
| author_sort | Venable, John |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | It has been more than ten years since the publication of Hevner et al [1] and five years since Venable [2] surveyed editors and DSR researchers on standards and criteria for judging the quality and suitability of DSR submissions for publication. Since then, there has been much further discussion about evaluation, design theory, and standards for DSR publication. This paper attempts to answer the question of how standards for judging the quality (e.g., rigour and relevance) of DSR research publications have changed since 2010 and to develop a snapshot of the relative importance of different extant DSR publication criteria. To do so, the author surveyed editors of IS Scholars’ “basket-of-eight” journals, DESRIST conference program committee members, and DESRIST (co-)authors. This paper compares the quantitative findings of the current survey to the 2010 survey. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:21:08Z |
| format | Conference Paper |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-44435 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:21:08Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Springer |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-444352023-02-27T07:34:28Z Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? Venable, John Brian Donnellan Markus Helfert Jim Kenneally Debra VanderMeer Marcus Rothenberger Robert Winter It has been more than ten years since the publication of Hevner et al [1] and five years since Venable [2] surveyed editors and DSR researchers on standards and criteria for judging the quality and suitability of DSR submissions for publication. Since then, there has been much further discussion about evaluation, design theory, and standards for DSR publication. This paper attempts to answer the question of how standards for judging the quality (e.g., rigour and relevance) of DSR research publications have changed since 2010 and to develop a snapshot of the relative importance of different extant DSR publication criteria. To do so, the author surveyed editors of IS Scholars’ “basket-of-eight” journals, DESRIST conference program committee members, and DESRIST (co-)authors. This paper compares the quantitative findings of the current survey to the 2010 survey. 2015 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44435 10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_17 Springer restricted |
| spellingShingle | Venable, John Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? |
| title | Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? |
| title_full | Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? |
| title_fullStr | Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? |
| title_short | Five and Ten Years on: Have DSR Standards Changed? |
| title_sort | five and ten years on: have dsr standards changed? |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44435 |