Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science
| Main Authors: | Steinhauser, G., Adlassnig, W., Ahau Risch, J., Anderlini, E., Arguriou, P., Armendariz, A.Z., Bains, W., et al. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2012
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4393 |
Similar Items
Editorial: What reviewers want: How to make your article more appealing to peer reviewers
by: Hagger, Martin
Published: (2013)
by: Hagger, Martin
Published: (2013)
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
by: Tennant, J., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Tennant, J., et al.
Published: (2017)
Peer Review Art
by: Sorooshian, Shahryar
Published: (2017)
by: Sorooshian, Shahryar
Published: (2017)
Integrative taxonomy versus taxonomic authority without peer review: the case of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Tephritidae)
by: Schutze, Mark K., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Schutze, Mark K., et al.
Published: (2017)
Editorial
by: Love, Peter, et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Love, Peter, et al.
Published: (2014)
Editorial notice.
by: Low, W., et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Low, W., et al.
Published: (2013)
Editorial Note
by: Saptoro, Agus, et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Saptoro, Agus, et al.
Published: (2017)
A comparison of key attributes between peer-to-peer accommodations and hotels using online reviews
by: Zhang, G., et al.
Published: (2019)
by: Zhang, G., et al.
Published: (2019)
Editorial
by: He, Z., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: He, Z., et al.
Published: (2015)
'Science first': An exploration of the assessment and role of language in the editorial practices of 'hard science' academic journals
by: Von Delius, Sarah
Published: (2015)
by: Von Delius, Sarah
Published: (2015)
Integrative taxonomy versus taxonomic authority without peer review: the case of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis(Tephritidae)
by: Schutze, Mark K., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Schutze, Mark K., et al.
Published: (2017)
Editorial: A trial of naloxone for peer administration has merit, but will the lawyers let it happen?
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2000)
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2000)
Guest editorial : building a science of desert living.
by: Stafford Smith, Mark, et al.
Published: (2008)
by: Stafford Smith, Mark, et al.
Published: (2008)
An Experimental Examination of the Differences in Readers's Responses to Editorial versus Advertising for Travel Destinations
by: Holben, Sharna, et al.
Published: (2006)
by: Holben, Sharna, et al.
Published: (2006)
The Development of an On-line Submission and Peer Review System
by: Pavey, Paul, et al.
Published: (2000)
by: Pavey, Paul, et al.
Published: (2000)
Peer review improves the quality of MCQ examinations
by: Malau-Aduli, B., et al.
Published: (2012)
by: Malau-Aduli, B., et al.
Published: (2012)
Abuse of peer review process by sham authors
by: T., Senthil Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020)
by: T., Senthil Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020)
Impact of Peer Review on the ESL Composing Process
by: Salih Ahmed, Abdel Rahman Abdalla
Published: (2003)
by: Salih Ahmed, Abdel Rahman Abdalla
Published: (2003)
Editorial: Now is the time to take steps to allow peer access to naloxone for heroin overdose in Australia
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2009)
by: Lenton, Simon, et al.
Published: (2009)
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Tennant, Jonathan P., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Tennant, Jonathan P., et al.
Published: (2017)
A systematic review of file sharing in mobile devices using peer-to-peer systems
by: Yasin, Waheed, et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Yasin, Waheed, et al.
Published: (2011)
Global trends of peer to peer (P2P) lending: A bibliometrics review
by: Teh, Gah Moon
Published: (2019)
by: Teh, Gah Moon
Published: (2019)
The multidimensional peer victimization scale: a systematic review
by: Joseph, Stephen, et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Joseph, Stephen, et al.
Published: (2018)
Responding to student's writing: a critique of peer review
by: Mohd. Asraf, Ratnawati
Published: (2011)
by: Mohd. Asraf, Ratnawati
Published: (2011)
Review : Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) versus cancer
by: Marina, Mohd Sham, et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Marina, Mohd Sham, et al.
Published: (2014)
Guest editorial: Innovative practices in business, trade and commerce – challenges and opportunities
by: Sharma, Piyush, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Sharma, Piyush, et al.
Published: (2023)
Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students
by: Roh, Y., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Roh, Y., et al.
Published: (2016)
Editorial on robotics in building and infrastructure editorial
by: Kang, S., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Kang, S., et al.
Published: (2014)
Editorial: Contextualizing Culturally Relevant Science and Mathematics Teaching for Indigenous Learning
by: Abrams, Eleanor, et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Abrams, Eleanor, et al.
Published: (2013)
Editorial
by: Solihu, Abdul Kabir Hussain
Published: (2014)
by: Solihu, Abdul Kabir Hussain
Published: (2014)
Editorial
by: Pathan, Al-Sakib Khan, et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Pathan, Al-Sakib Khan, et al.
Published: (2015)
Editorial
by: Solihu, Abdul Kabir Hussain
Published: (2015)
by: Solihu, Abdul Kabir Hussain
Published: (2015)
Similar Items
-
Editorial: What reviewers want: How to make your article more appealing to peer reviewers
by: Hagger, Martin
Published: (2013) -
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
by: Tennant, J., et al.
Published: (2017) -
Peer Review Art
by: Sorooshian, Shahryar
Published: (2017) -
Integrative taxonomy versus taxonomic authority without peer review: the case of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Tephritidae)
by: Schutze, Mark K., et al.
Published: (2017) -
Editorial
by: Love, Peter, et al.
Published: (2014)