International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus

This paper consolidates international responses to the argument that there is a need to strengthen impact assessment (IA) through greater integration and focus. It is based on invited reflections by various international authors in the field of IA. The main conclusions are that power and context are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Retief, F., Bond, A., Gunn, J., Pope, Jennifer, Morrison-Saunders, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43832
_version_ 1848756821557248000
author Retief, F.
Bond, A.
Gunn, J.
Pope, Jennifer
Morrison-Saunders, A.
author_facet Retief, F.
Bond, A.
Gunn, J.
Pope, Jennifer
Morrison-Saunders, A.
author_sort Retief, F.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper consolidates international responses to the argument that there is a need to strengthen impact assessment (IA) through greater integration and focus. It is based on invited reflections by various international authors in the field of IA. The main conclusions are that power and context are important underlying reasons for the diversity of IA types; that in certain instances IA legislation works against achieving integration and focus; and that there is a pressing need to be able to measure and demonstrate added value and effectiveness in practice. The paper concludes by setting a research agenda reflecting the need to better understand why diversity exists in IA, what stakeholders expect from the process and how to improve practice based on greater understanding of what the various types of IA deliver.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:18:17Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-43832
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:18:17Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Taylor & Francis
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-438322017-09-13T13:42:26Z International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus Retief, F. Bond, A. Gunn, J. Pope, Jennifer Morrison-Saunders, A. This paper consolidates international responses to the argument that there is a need to strengthen impact assessment (IA) through greater integration and focus. It is based on invited reflections by various international authors in the field of IA. The main conclusions are that power and context are important underlying reasons for the diversity of IA types; that in certain instances IA legislation works against achieving integration and focus; and that there is a pressing need to be able to measure and demonstrate added value and effectiveness in practice. The paper concludes by setting a research agenda reflecting the need to better understand why diversity exists in IA, what stakeholders expect from the process and how to improve practice based on greater understanding of what the various types of IA deliver. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43832 10.1080/14615517.2014.885638 Taylor & Francis unknown
spellingShingle Retief, F.
Bond, A.
Gunn, J.
Pope, Jennifer
Morrison-Saunders, A.
International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
title International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
title_full International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
title_fullStr International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
title_full_unstemmed International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
title_short International perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
title_sort international perspectives on the strengthening of impact assessment through integration and focus
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43832