Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?

Stock assessments of tropical demersal teleost fisheries generally rely on fishery-dependent samples of age structure. Baited remote underwater stereo-video (stereo-BRUV) systems can provide fishery independent information on the biases and selectivity of particular fishing gears in relation to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Langlois, T., Newman, Stephen, Cappo, M., Harvey, Euan, Rome, B., Skepper, C., Wakefield, C.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43635
_version_ 1848756758169780224
author Langlois, T.
Newman, Stephen
Cappo, M.
Harvey, Euan
Rome, B.
Skepper, C.
Wakefield, C.
author_facet Langlois, T.
Newman, Stephen
Cappo, M.
Harvey, Euan
Rome, B.
Skepper, C.
Wakefield, C.
author_sort Langlois, T.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Stock assessments of tropical demersal teleost fisheries generally rely on fishery-dependent samples of age structure. Baited remote underwater stereo-video (stereo-BRUV) systems can provide fishery independent information on the biases and selectivity of particular fishing gears in relation to the length distribution of what is potentially available for capture. In the tropical demersal fishery off northwestern Australia the length distributions of 12 species sampled by standard commercial fish traps and stereo-BRUVs were compared using kernel density estimation techniques. We found no significant differences in the shape of the length distributions sampled by either method. However, the location (mean length) of the length distribution of seven of the 11 target species and the one bycatch species differed between the sampling methods. A family-specific trend was exhibited, likely due to the ambush behaviour of larger epinephelids in traps and the saturation of the field of view of stereo-BRUV by schools of smaller lutjanids. However, the difference in mean length was not biologically significant for these families. These results indicate that samples of target species derived from commercial trap catches are likely to provide representative and robust estimates of vital population statistics and life history parameters.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:17:17Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-43635
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:17:17Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-436352017-09-13T16:04:39Z Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias? Langlois, T. Newman, Stephen Cappo, M. Harvey, Euan Rome, B. Skepper, C. Wakefield, C. Epinephelidae Kimberley Fishery independent Length frequency Lutjanidae Stereo BRUV Stock assessments of tropical demersal teleost fisheries generally rely on fishery-dependent samples of age structure. Baited remote underwater stereo-video (stereo-BRUV) systems can provide fishery independent information on the biases and selectivity of particular fishing gears in relation to the length distribution of what is potentially available for capture. In the tropical demersal fishery off northwestern Australia the length distributions of 12 species sampled by standard commercial fish traps and stereo-BRUVs were compared using kernel density estimation techniques. We found no significant differences in the shape of the length distributions sampled by either method. However, the location (mean length) of the length distribution of seven of the 11 target species and the one bycatch species differed between the sampling methods. A family-specific trend was exhibited, likely due to the ambush behaviour of larger epinephelids in traps and the saturation of the field of view of stereo-BRUV by schools of smaller lutjanids. However, the difference in mean length was not biologically significant for these families. These results indicate that samples of target species derived from commercial trap catches are likely to provide representative and robust estimates of vital population statistics and life history parameters. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43635 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.06.008 Elsevier BV restricted
spellingShingle Epinephelidae
Kimberley
Fishery independent
Length frequency
Lutjanidae
Stereo BRUV
Langlois, T.
Newman, Stephen
Cappo, M.
Harvey, Euan
Rome, B.
Skepper, C.
Wakefield, C.
Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?
title Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?
title_full Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?
title_fullStr Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?
title_full_unstemmed Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?
title_short Length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: Is there evidence of sampling bias?
title_sort length selectivity of commercial fish traps assessed from in situ comparisons with stereo-video: is there evidence of sampling bias?
topic Epinephelidae
Kimberley
Fishery independent
Length frequency
Lutjanidae
Stereo BRUV
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43635