Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis

How an animal receives sound may influence its use of sound. While ‘jaw hearing’ is well supported for odontocetes, work examining how sound is received across the head has been limited to a few representative species. The substantial variation in jaw and head morphology among odontocetes suggests v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mooney, A., Li, S., Ketten, Darlene, Wang, K., Wang, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43590
_version_ 1848756742684409856
author Mooney, A.
Li, S.
Ketten, Darlene
Wang, K.
Wang, D.
author_facet Mooney, A.
Li, S.
Ketten, Darlene
Wang, K.
Wang, D.
author_sort Mooney, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description How an animal receives sound may influence its use of sound. While ‘jaw hearing’ is well supported for odontocetes, work examining how sound is received across the head has been limited to a few representative species. The substantial variation in jaw and head morphology among odontocetes suggests variation in sound reception. Here, we address how a divergent subspecies, the Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis) hears low-, mid- and high-frequency tones, as well as broadband clicks, comparing sounds presented at different locations across the head. Hearing was measured using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Click and tone stimuli (8, 54 and 120 kHz) were presented at nine locations on the head and body using a suction-cup transducer. Threshold differences were compared between frequencies and locations, and referenced to the underlying anatomy using computed tomography (CT) imaging of deceased animals of the same subspecies. The best hearing locations with minimum thresholds were found adjacent to a mandibular fat pad and overlaying the auditory bulla. Mean thresholds were not substantially different at locations from the rostrum tip to the ear (11.6 dB). This contrasts with tests with bottlenose dolphins and beluga whales, in which 30–40 dB threshold differences were found across the animals' heads. Response latencies increased with decreasing response amplitudes, which suggests that latency and sensitivity are interrelated when considering sound reception across the odontocete head. The results suggest that there are differences among odontocetes in the anatomy related to receiving sound, and porpoises may have relatively less acoustic ‘shadowing’.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:17:02Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-43590
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:17:02Z
publishDate 2014
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-435902017-09-13T13:39:38Z Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis Mooney, A. Li, S. Ketten, Darlene Wang, K. Wang, D. Marine Mammal Sensory Communication Noise Odontocete Auditory Brainstem response How an animal receives sound may influence its use of sound. While ‘jaw hearing’ is well supported for odontocetes, work examining how sound is received across the head has been limited to a few representative species. The substantial variation in jaw and head morphology among odontocetes suggests variation in sound reception. Here, we address how a divergent subspecies, the Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis) hears low-, mid- and high-frequency tones, as well as broadband clicks, comparing sounds presented at different locations across the head. Hearing was measured using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Click and tone stimuli (8, 54 and 120 kHz) were presented at nine locations on the head and body using a suction-cup transducer. Threshold differences were compared between frequencies and locations, and referenced to the underlying anatomy using computed tomography (CT) imaging of deceased animals of the same subspecies. The best hearing locations with minimum thresholds were found adjacent to a mandibular fat pad and overlaying the auditory bulla. Mean thresholds were not substantially different at locations from the rostrum tip to the ear (11.6 dB). This contrasts with tests with bottlenose dolphins and beluga whales, in which 30–40 dB threshold differences were found across the animals' heads. Response latencies increased with decreasing response amplitudes, which suggests that latency and sensitivity are interrelated when considering sound reception across the odontocete head. The results suggest that there are differences among odontocetes in the anatomy related to receiving sound, and porpoises may have relatively less acoustic ‘shadowing’. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43590 10.1242/jeb.093773 The Company of Biologists Ltd unknown
spellingShingle Marine Mammal
Sensory
Communication
Noise
Odontocete
Auditory Brainstem response
Mooney, A.
Li, S.
Ketten, Darlene
Wang, K.
Wang, D.
Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
title Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
title_full Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
title_fullStr Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
title_full_unstemmed Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
title_short Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
title_sort hearing pathways in the yangtze finless porpoise, neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
topic Marine Mammal
Sensory
Communication
Noise
Odontocete
Auditory Brainstem response
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43590