Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes?
© 2015 Australasian Medical Journal Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. Background In New Zealand the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) is a state-funded insurance agency that accepts claims for accidental injuries, including lumbar spine injuries. It is unknown whether ACC claim status (accepted, n...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Australasian Medical Journal Pty Ltd
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43451 |
| _version_ | 1848756695196499968 |
|---|---|
| author | Melloh, Markus Cornwall, J. Crawford, R. Elfering, A. |
| author_facet | Melloh, Markus Cornwall, J. Crawford, R. Elfering, A. |
| author_sort | Melloh, Markus |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | © 2015 Australasian Medical Journal Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. Background In New Zealand the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) is a state-funded insurance agency that accepts claims for accidental injuries, including lumbar spine injuries. It is unknown whether ACC claim status (accepted, not accepted) affects low back pain (LBP) outcomes, or whether benefit status (e.g., sickness, disability) further affects outcomes in patients without ACC cover. Aims This study aimed to determine whether ACC claim and benefit status are likely to influence a range of outcomes for people with LBP in New Zealand. Methods A prospective survey of low back pain patients was performed (April 2008-October 2010). ACC claim status was recorded, and individuals without accepted claims indicated benefit status. Surveys were sent at multiple time points; pain, functional limitation, psychological factors, and general health were assessed. Statistical analysis was undertaken using ANCOVA and ANOVA (p<0.05). Resu lts In total, 168 patients completed the study. Six-month measures showed individuals with no ACC claim for LBP to overall have poorer outcomes (mental health, p=0.039; pain, p=0.045; functional limitation, p=0.049); sub-group analysis (no ACC claim) between those with or without a benefit showed those on benefits to have significantly higher functional limitation (p<0.001), poorer physical health (p=0.002), greater pain (p=0.027), and stronger fear avoidance behaviours for both work (p=0.047) and physical activity (p=0.35). Conclusion Findings indicate individuals with accepted ACC claims for LBP have significantly better outcomes than those without, and patients on benefits with no accepted ACC claim for LBP have even poorer outcomes. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:16:17Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-43451 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T09:16:17Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Australasian Medical Journal Pty Ltd |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-434512017-09-13T13:59:39Z Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? Melloh, Markus Cornwall, J. Crawford, R. Elfering, A. © 2015 Australasian Medical Journal Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. Background In New Zealand the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) is a state-funded insurance agency that accepts claims for accidental injuries, including lumbar spine injuries. It is unknown whether ACC claim status (accepted, not accepted) affects low back pain (LBP) outcomes, or whether benefit status (e.g., sickness, disability) further affects outcomes in patients without ACC cover. Aims This study aimed to determine whether ACC claim and benefit status are likely to influence a range of outcomes for people with LBP in New Zealand. Methods A prospective survey of low back pain patients was performed (April 2008-October 2010). ACC claim status was recorded, and individuals without accepted claims indicated benefit status. Surveys were sent at multiple time points; pain, functional limitation, psychological factors, and general health were assessed. Statistical analysis was undertaken using ANCOVA and ANOVA (p<0.05). Resu lts In total, 168 patients completed the study. Six-month measures showed individuals with no ACC claim for LBP to overall have poorer outcomes (mental health, p=0.039; pain, p=0.045; functional limitation, p=0.049); sub-group analysis (no ACC claim) between those with or without a benefit showed those on benefits to have significantly higher functional limitation (p<0.001), poorer physical health (p=0.002), greater pain (p=0.027), and stronger fear avoidance behaviours for both work (p=0.047) and physical activity (p=0.35). Conclusion Findings indicate individuals with accepted ACC claims for LBP have significantly better outcomes than those without, and patients on benefits with no accepted ACC claim for LBP have even poorer outcomes. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43451 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2464 Australasian Medical Journal Pty Ltd unknown |
| spellingShingle | Melloh, Markus Cornwall, J. Crawford, R. Elfering, A. Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| title | Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| title_full | Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| title_fullStr | Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| title_short | Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| title_sort | does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes? |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43451 |