Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities

At a time of increasing global urbanisation, research consistently indicates that crime and the fear of crime are key concerns for urban populations in both developed and developing countries and communal safety is considered to be one of the key features of a high quality environment (Dempsey, 2008...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cozens, Paul
Other Authors: National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)
Format: Conference Paper
Published: Publishers: Collage of Planning and Design, National Cheng Kung University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43159
_version_ 1848756613427494912
author Cozens, Paul
author2 National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)
author_facet National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)
Cozens, Paul
author_sort Cozens, Paul
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description At a time of increasing global urbanisation, research consistently indicates that crime and the fear of crime are key concerns for urban populations in both developed and developing countries and communal safety is considered to be one of the key features of a high quality environment (Dempsey, 2008). Government planning policy in the UK, USA and Australia now advocates high density,mixed-use residential developments in walkable, permeable neighbourhoods, close to public transport, employment and amenities. It is argued that this approach, commonly known as New Urbanism, reduces urban sprawl, contributes to the development of more sustainable cities and also reduces crime by promoting street level activity and at the same time, 'eyes on the street' (Jacobs, 1961). However, Dempsey (2008) has recently challenged the assumption that various features of a quality built environment are actually socially beneficial.Evidence from environmental criminology challenges three of these assertions, indicating that highly permeable street configurations, mixed-use developments and high densities are commonly associated with increased levels of crime by virtue of the increased numbers of both potential offenders and potential targets made available (Brantingham and Brantingham, 1998). This evidence is not commonly utilised by New Urbanists or planners generally, and indicates that there are contradictions between some of the features assumed to contribute to a quality built environment. This paper presents the criminological evidence and discusses the key theories within environmental criminology which can enhance our understanding of crime issues within planning and encourage a more informed dialogue across the disciplines of planning and criminology.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:14:59Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-43159
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:14:59Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Publishers: Collage of Planning and Design, National Cheng Kung University
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-431592017-01-30T15:05:20Z Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities Cozens, Paul National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) designing out crime Safer cities urban crime high-density living permeability urban sustainability mixed-use development environmental criminology At a time of increasing global urbanisation, research consistently indicates that crime and the fear of crime are key concerns for urban populations in both developed and developing countries and communal safety is considered to be one of the key features of a high quality environment (Dempsey, 2008). Government planning policy in the UK, USA and Australia now advocates high density,mixed-use residential developments in walkable, permeable neighbourhoods, close to public transport, employment and amenities. It is argued that this approach, commonly known as New Urbanism, reduces urban sprawl, contributes to the development of more sustainable cities and also reduces crime by promoting street level activity and at the same time, 'eyes on the street' (Jacobs, 1961). However, Dempsey (2008) has recently challenged the assumption that various features of a quality built environment are actually socially beneficial.Evidence from environmental criminology challenges three of these assertions, indicating that highly permeable street configurations, mixed-use developments and high densities are commonly associated with increased levels of crime by virtue of the increased numbers of both potential offenders and potential targets made available (Brantingham and Brantingham, 1998). This evidence is not commonly utilised by New Urbanists or planners generally, and indicates that there are contradictions between some of the features assumed to contribute to a quality built environment. This paper presents the criminological evidence and discusses the key theories within environmental criminology which can enhance our understanding of crime issues within planning and encourage a more informed dialogue across the disciplines of planning and criminology. 2009 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43159 Publishers: Collage of Planning and Design, National Cheng Kung University fulltext
spellingShingle crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED)
designing out crime
Safer cities
urban crime
high-density living
permeability
urban sustainability
mixed-use development
environmental criminology
Cozens, Paul
Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
title Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
title_full Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
title_fullStr Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
title_full_unstemmed Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
title_short Environmental criminology and planning: A dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
title_sort environmental criminology and planning: a dialogue for a new perspective on safer cities
topic crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED)
designing out crime
Safer cities
urban crime
high-density living
permeability
urban sustainability
mixed-use development
environmental criminology
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43159