Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary

The use of the curse or cure dichotomy to frame a discussion around the impacts of mining is an oversimplification, not least in the emphasis on one or the other (as opposed to curse and cure). It is, however, a potent trope for engaging critically with the consequences of mining not only in narrow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brueckner, Martin, Durey, Angela, Mayes, Robyn, Pforr, Christof
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Springer 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42581
_version_ 1848756459356028928
author Brueckner, Martin
Durey, Angela
Mayes, Robyn
Pforr, Christof
author2 Brueckner, Martin
author_facet Brueckner, Martin
Brueckner, Martin
Durey, Angela
Mayes, Robyn
Pforr, Christof
author_sort Brueckner, Martin
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The use of the curse or cure dichotomy to frame a discussion around the impacts of mining is an oversimplification, not least in the emphasis on one or the other (as opposed to curse and cure). It is, however, a potent trope for engaging critically with the consequences of mining not only in narrow economic terms but also in regard to political, social and environmental costs and benefits. Further, as Goodman and Worth (2008: 201) point out, to engage with the resource curse or cure question is to also engage more broadly with “the internal contradictions of capitalist development” as evident, for example, in divisions “between those who benefit from and those who bear the costs of accumulation” and the many conflicts—political, social, economic, environmental—attending resource extraction. It is in this sense that this volume mobilises the ‘resource curse or cure?’ motif.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:12:32Z
format Book Chapter
id curtin-20.500.11937-42581
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:12:32Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-425812023-02-27T07:34:26Z Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary Brueckner, Martin Durey, Angela Mayes, Robyn Pforr, Christof Brueckner, Martin Durey, Angela Mayes, Robyn Pforr, Christof The use of the curse or cure dichotomy to frame a discussion around the impacts of mining is an oversimplification, not least in the emphasis on one or the other (as opposed to curse and cure). It is, however, a potent trope for engaging critically with the consequences of mining not only in narrow economic terms but also in regard to political, social and environmental costs and benefits. Further, as Goodman and Worth (2008: 201) point out, to engage with the resource curse or cure question is to also engage more broadly with “the internal contradictions of capitalist development” as evident, for example, in divisions “between those who benefit from and those who bear the costs of accumulation” and the many conflicts—political, social, economic, environmental—attending resource extraction. It is in this sense that this volume mobilises the ‘resource curse or cure?’ motif. 2014 Book Chapter http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42581 10.1007/978-3-642-53873-5_1 Springer restricted
spellingShingle Brueckner, Martin
Durey, Angela
Mayes, Robyn
Pforr, Christof
Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
title Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
title_full Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
title_fullStr Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
title_full_unstemmed Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
title_short Confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
title_sort confronting the 'resource curse or cure' binary
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42581