Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes

The sampling efficiencies of commercial standard fish traps and baited remote underwater stereo-video systems (stereo-BRUVs) were compared by examining the diversity and relative abundance of tropical demersal fish that each method sampled on the north-western shelf (40–60 m) of Western Australia. S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harvey, Euan, Newman, S., McLean, D., Cappo, M., Meeuwig, J., Skepper, C.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42439
_version_ 1848756419836248064
author Harvey, Euan
Newman, S.
McLean, D.
Cappo, M.
Meeuwig, J.
Skepper, C.
author_facet Harvey, Euan
Newman, S.
McLean, D.
Cappo, M.
Meeuwig, J.
Skepper, C.
author_sort Harvey, Euan
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The sampling efficiencies of commercial standard fish traps and baited remote underwater stereo-video systems (stereo-BRUVs) were compared by examining the diversity and relative abundance of tropical demersal fish that each method sampled on the north-western shelf (40–60 m) of Western Australia. Stereo-BRUVs recorded many more species (91 species from 32 families) than commercial fish traps (30 species and 15 families). Stereo-BRUVs also sampled many more individuals (mean 36.55±5.91 SE) than fish traps (mean 12.30±1.40 SE). This suggests stereo-BRUVs would be more capable of detectingchanges in the relative abundance of species over time. Data from four commercially important species (Epinephelus bilobatus, Epinephelus multinotatus, Lethrinus punctulatus and Lutjanus russelli) revealed that stereo-BRUVs had much greater statistical power to detect change than an equivalent number of samples from fish traps. In contrast, fish traps had a greater statistical power to detect change for a fifth target species, Lutjanus sebae. For two commonly sampled species, Abalistes stellatus1 and Lethrinus punctulatus,stereo-BRUVs sampled a smaller mean length than fish traps while for a third species, Lutjanus sebae, stereo-BRUVs recorded a larger mean length. The length frequencies for these species were not significantly different between methods, although stereo-BRUVs sampled a much larger range of lengths than was captured in traps. This study demonstrates that stereo-BRUVs are potentially a much more powerful technique than fish traps for assessing species richness, relative abundance and size structure inmulti-species fisheries in north-western Australia.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:11:54Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-42439
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:11:54Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-424392017-09-13T16:00:28Z Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes Harvey, Euan Newman, S. McLean, D. Cappo, M. Meeuwig, J. Skepper, C. Stereo-BRUVs Sampling efficiency Demersal fish assemblages Nocturnal Statistical power Diurnal The sampling efficiencies of commercial standard fish traps and baited remote underwater stereo-video systems (stereo-BRUVs) were compared by examining the diversity and relative abundance of tropical demersal fish that each method sampled on the north-western shelf (40–60 m) of Western Australia. Stereo-BRUVs recorded many more species (91 species from 32 families) than commercial fish traps (30 species and 15 families). Stereo-BRUVs also sampled many more individuals (mean 36.55±5.91 SE) than fish traps (mean 12.30±1.40 SE). This suggests stereo-BRUVs would be more capable of detectingchanges in the relative abundance of species over time. Data from four commercially important species (Epinephelus bilobatus, Epinephelus multinotatus, Lethrinus punctulatus and Lutjanus russelli) revealed that stereo-BRUVs had much greater statistical power to detect change than an equivalent number of samples from fish traps. In contrast, fish traps had a greater statistical power to detect change for a fifth target species, Lutjanus sebae. For two commonly sampled species, Abalistes stellatus1 and Lethrinus punctulatus,stereo-BRUVs sampled a smaller mean length than fish traps while for a third species, Lutjanus sebae, stereo-BRUVs recorded a larger mean length. The length frequencies for these species were not significantly different between methods, although stereo-BRUVs sampled a much larger range of lengths than was captured in traps. This study demonstrates that stereo-BRUVs are potentially a much more powerful technique than fish traps for assessing species richness, relative abundance and size structure inmulti-species fisheries in north-western Australia. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42439 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.01.026 Elsevier BV restricted
spellingShingle Stereo-BRUVs
Sampling efficiency
Demersal fish assemblages
Nocturnal
Statistical power
Diurnal
Harvey, Euan
Newman, S.
McLean, D.
Cappo, M.
Meeuwig, J.
Skepper, C.
Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
title Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
title_full Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
title_fullStr Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
title_short Comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
title_sort comparison of the relative efficiencies of stereo-bruvs and traps for samplingtropical continental shelf demersal fishes
topic Stereo-BRUVs
Sampling efficiency
Demersal fish assemblages
Nocturnal
Statistical power
Diurnal
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42439