Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution

© 2009 by John P. Spencer, Michael S. C. Thomas, and James L. McClelland. All rights reserved.A tension has existed between connectionism and dynamic systems theory (DST), and this chapter considers why this should be the case. The chapter argues that much of the tension arises from a tenet that the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas, M., McClelland, J., Richardson, F., Schapiro, A., Baughman, Frank
Format: Book Chapter
Published: Oxford University Press 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41761
_version_ 1848756233527361536
author Thomas, M.
McClelland, J.
Richardson, F.
Schapiro, A.
Baughman, Frank
author_facet Thomas, M.
McClelland, J.
Richardson, F.
Schapiro, A.
Baughman, Frank
author_sort Thomas, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2009 by John P. Spencer, Michael S. C. Thomas, and James L. McClelland. All rights reserved.A tension has existed between connectionism and dynamic systems theory (DST), and this chapter considers why this should be the case. The chapter argues that much of the tension arises from a tenet that the two approaches share: they both rely on the explicit, quantitative instantiation of ideas in mathematical or computational models. The use of such models is responsible for much of the theoretical progress generated by connectionism and DST beyond the theories of good old-fashioned cognitive development (GOFCD). But the use of explicit, quantitative models brings with it a new set of problems. The chapter discusses several consequences of the use of such models and considers three points of apparent disagreement between connectionism and DST.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:08:57Z
format Book Chapter
id curtin-20.500.11937-41761
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:08:57Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-417612017-09-13T14:16:25Z Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution Thomas, M. McClelland, J. Richardson, F. Schapiro, A. Baughman, Frank © 2009 by John P. Spencer, Michael S. C. Thomas, and James L. McClelland. All rights reserved.A tension has existed between connectionism and dynamic systems theory (DST), and this chapter considers why this should be the case. The chapter argues that much of the tension arises from a tenet that the two approaches share: they both rely on the explicit, quantitative instantiation of ideas in mathematical or computational models. The use of such models is responsible for much of the theoretical progress generated by connectionism and DST beyond the theories of good old-fashioned cognitive development (GOFCD). But the use of explicit, quantitative models brings with it a new set of problems. The chapter discusses several consequences of the use of such models and considers three points of apparent disagreement between connectionism and DST. 2009 Book Chapter http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41761 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0017 Oxford University Press restricted
spellingShingle Thomas, M.
McClelland, J.
Richardson, F.
Schapiro, A.
Baughman, Frank
Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution
title Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution
title_full Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution
title_fullStr Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution
title_short Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution
title_sort dynamic and connectionist approaches to development: toward a future of mutually beneficial coevolution
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41761