The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision

Introduction: ‘Addiction’ is an ambiguous concept. Its meaning, and how it is used in drug policy and treatment, depends on how it is conceptualised. While the ‘disease’ model of addiction is prevalent in Australia, differing, sometimes contradictory, interpretations of this model are mobilised.Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karasaki, M., Fraser, Suzanne, Moore, David, Dietze, P.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41697
_version_ 1848756217043746816
author Karasaki, M.
Fraser, Suzanne
Moore, David
Dietze, P.
author_facet Karasaki, M.
Fraser, Suzanne
Moore, David
Dietze, P.
author_sort Karasaki, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction: ‘Addiction’ is an ambiguous concept. Its meaning, and how it is used in drug policy and treatment, depends on how it is conceptualised. While the ‘disease’ model of addiction is prevalent in Australia, differing, sometimes contradictory, interpretations of this model are mobilised.Methods: Drawing on 20 semi-structured interviews conducted with professionals working in the area of drug use in Victoria, Australia, this paper develops a typology delineating different approaches to addiction.Results: Five domains of meaning related to addiction were identified in the data. These were: (i) the sign of craving; (ii) susceptibility; (iii) social and psychological issues producing addiction; (iv) self-concept; and (v) social functions of addiction. These domains are further divided into two subtypes based on how the participants understood the role of a key notion in addiction: volition, that is, whether or not an ‘addict’ has control over drug use and other aspects of life.Discussion: By systematically mapping different conceptualisations of addiction, this typology identifies the ambiguities and contradictions in the models currently in use, especially with respect to the notion of volition. While a homogeneous approach to these issues is neither practical nor desirable, there is a need to consider the implications of this lack of coherence.Conclusions: Service providers, medical practitioners and policy makers need to reflect on their assumptions, and consider the implications of their different approaches for clients, some of whom encounter more than one approach when undergoing treatment for drug use.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:08:41Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-41697
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:08:41Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-416972017-09-13T14:15:44Z The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision Karasaki, M. Fraser, Suzanne Moore, David Dietze, P. qualitative research addiction Australia policy volition Introduction: ‘Addiction’ is an ambiguous concept. Its meaning, and how it is used in drug policy and treatment, depends on how it is conceptualised. While the ‘disease’ model of addiction is prevalent in Australia, differing, sometimes contradictory, interpretations of this model are mobilised.Methods: Drawing on 20 semi-structured interviews conducted with professionals working in the area of drug use in Victoria, Australia, this paper develops a typology delineating different approaches to addiction.Results: Five domains of meaning related to addiction were identified in the data. These were: (i) the sign of craving; (ii) susceptibility; (iii) social and psychological issues producing addiction; (iv) self-concept; and (v) social functions of addiction. These domains are further divided into two subtypes based on how the participants understood the role of a key notion in addiction: volition, that is, whether or not an ‘addict’ has control over drug use and other aspects of life.Discussion: By systematically mapping different conceptualisations of addiction, this typology identifies the ambiguities and contradictions in the models currently in use, especially with respect to the notion of volition. While a homogeneous approach to these issues is neither practical nor desirable, there is a need to consider the implications of this lack of coherence.Conclusions: Service providers, medical practitioners and policy makers need to reflect on their assumptions, and consider the implications of their different approaches for clients, some of whom encounter more than one approach when undergoing treatment for drug use. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41697 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00501.x Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle qualitative research
addiction
Australia
policy
volition
Karasaki, M.
Fraser, Suzanne
Moore, David
Dietze, P.
The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
title The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
title_full The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
title_fullStr The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
title_full_unstemmed The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
title_short The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
title_sort place of volition in addiction: differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision
topic qualitative research
addiction
Australia
policy
volition
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41697