Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format
Purpose: To assess the feasibility of using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to value health states within the QLU-C10D, a utility instrument derived from the QLQ-C30, and to assess clarity, difficulty, and respondent preference between two presentation formats. Methods: We ran a DCE valuation tas...
| Main Authors: | Norman, Richard, Viney, R., Aaronson, N., Brazier, J., Cella, D., Costa, D., Fayers, P., Kemmler, G., Peacock, S., Pickard, A., Rowen, D., Street, D., Velikova, G., Young, T., King, M. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer International Publishing Switzerland
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41664 |
Similar Items
QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multiattribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30
by: King, M., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: King, M., et al.
Published: (2016)
Australian utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
by: King, M., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: King, M., et al.
Published: (2017)
Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States
by: Gamper, E., et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Gamper, E., et al.
Published: (2018)
An Australian Discrete Choice Experiment to Value EQ-5D Health States
by: Viney, R., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Viney, R., et al.
Published: (2014)
Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2014)
One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2018)
Order of presentation of dimensions did not systematically bias utility weights from a discrete choice experiment
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2016)
Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2018)
Is dimension order important when valuing health states using Discrete Choice Experiments including duration?
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2017)
A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2013)
Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments—A QALY space model approach
by: Gu, Y., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Gu, Y., et al.
Published: (2014)
Comparison of Contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D Responses Using Scoring Algorithms Derived from Similar Valuation Exercises
by: Whitehurst, D., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Whitehurst, D., et al.
Published: (2014)
Comparing Designs Constructed With and Without Priors for Choice Experiments: A Case Study
by: Burgess, L., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Burgess, L., et al.
Published: (2015)
Does Mode of Administration Matter? Comparison of Online and Face-To-Face Administration of a Time Trade-Off Task
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2010)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2010)
Measuring the Loss of Consumer Choice in Mandatory Health Programmes Using Discrete Choice Experiments
by: Parkinson, B., et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Parkinson, B., et al.
Published: (2013)
Efficiency and Equity: a Stated Preference Approach
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2013)
International Comparisons in Valuing EQ-5D Health States: A Review and Analysis
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2009)
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2009)
Attribute exclusion strategies in airline choice: Accounting for exogenous information on decision maker processing strategies in models of discrete choice
by: Rose, J., et al.
Published: (2012)
by: Rose, J., et al.
Published: (2012)
Time Trade-Off Derived EQ-5D Weights for Australia
by: Viney, R., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Viney, R., et al.
Published: (2011)
A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia
by: Wong, S.F., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Wong, S.F., et al.
Published: (2014)
A discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine the preferences of patients with cancer and their willingness to pay for different types of health care appointments
by: Wong, S., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Wong, S., et al.
Published: (2016)
Models for Discrete/Ordered Outcomes and Choice Models
by: Greene, William
Published: (2014)
by: Greene, William
Published: (2014)
Testing for structural breaks in discrete choice models
by: Wongsosaputro, J., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Wongsosaputro, J., et al.
Published: (2011)
The status quo in discrete choice experiments: is it relevant?
by: W Mohamad, Wan Norhidayah, et al.
Published: (2019)
by: W Mohamad, Wan Norhidayah, et al.
Published: (2019)
An information theoretic estimator for the mixed discrete choice model
by: Golan, A., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Golan, A., et al.
Published: (2016)
Pushed and pulled fronts in a discrete reaction-diffusion equation
by: King, John R., et al.
Published: (2015)
by: King, John R., et al.
Published: (2015)
Can young children make active choices? Outcomes of a feasibility trial in 7-year-old children
by: Hands, B., et al.
Published: (2011)
by: Hands, B., et al.
Published: (2011)
Travel mode choice modeling: Predictive efficacy between machine learning models and discrete choice model
by: Nur Fahriza, Mohd. Ali, et al.
Published: (2021)
by: Nur Fahriza, Mohd. Ali, et al.
Published: (2021)
Symptoms and feelings valued by patients after a percutaneous coronary intervention: A discrete-choice experiment to inform development of a new patient-reported outcome
by: Barker, A., et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Barker, A., et al.
Published: (2018)
The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
by: Barnett, N., et al.
Published: (2016)
by: Barnett, N., et al.
Published: (2016)
How should DCE with duration choice sets be presented for the valuation of health states
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2018)
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2018)
Viewers’ choice: discrete choice elements of viewer’s in portal television usage and preferred types of programs watched frequency in achieving gratifications
by: Hashim, Norliana, et al.
Published: (2021)
by: Hashim, Norliana, et al.
Published: (2021)
Day-case closure of ileostomy: feasible, safe and efficient
by: Bhalla, Ashish, et al.
Published: (2015)
by: Bhalla, Ashish, et al.
Published: (2015)
Hybrid volume-of-fluid and discrete particle solver for oil-mist filter simulations
by: King, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2010)
by: King, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2010)
Discrete element modelling of uniaxial constant strain rate tests on asphalt mixtures
by: Cai, W., et al.
Published: (2013)
by: Cai, W., et al.
Published: (2013)
Modeling ordered choices: A primer
by: Greene, William, et al.
Published: (2010)
by: Greene, William, et al.
Published: (2010)
What influences healthcare professionals' treatment preferences for older women with operable breast cancer?: an application of the discrete choice experiment
by: Morgan, J.L., et al.
Published: (2017)
by: Morgan, J.L., et al.
Published: (2017)
Multidimensional discrete compactons in nonlinear Schr¨odinger lattices with strong nonlinearity management
by: D’Ambroise, Jennie, et al.
Published: (2015)
by: D’Ambroise, Jennie, et al.
Published: (2015)
Prospects of renewable energy - a feasibility study in the Australian context
by: Shafiullah, G., et al.
Published: (2012)
by: Shafiullah, G., et al.
Published: (2012)
A Discrete Sliding-Mode Guidance Law
by: Zhou, D., et al.
Published: (2014)
by: Zhou, D., et al.
Published: (2014)
Similar Items
-
QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multiattribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30
by: King, M., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Australian utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
by: King, M., et al.
Published: (2017) -
Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States
by: Gamper, E., et al.
Published: (2018) -
An Australian Discrete Choice Experiment to Value EQ-5D Health States
by: Viney, R., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2014)