Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?

We consider the response of both nominal and real commodity prices on world markets to real and nominal shocks by hypothesizing that nominal shocks can permanently affect nominal commodity prices, but can have only temporary effect on real commodity prices. Real shocks, in contrast, can have permane...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bloch, Harry, Fraser, P., MacDonald, Garry
Format: Working Paper
Published: Centre for Research in Applied Economics, Curtin Business School 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41205
_version_ 1848756080246521856
author Bloch, Harry
Fraser, P.
MacDonald, Garry
author_facet Bloch, Harry
Fraser, P.
MacDonald, Garry
author_sort Bloch, Harry
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description We consider the response of both nominal and real commodity prices on world markets to real and nominal shocks by hypothesizing that nominal shocks can permanently affect nominal commodity prices, but can have only temporary effect on real commodity prices. Real shocks, in contrast, can have permanent as well as temporary effects on both nominal and real commodity prices. When nominal and real shocks are decomposed in this manner, real shocks are found to be of much greater importance to the observed movements in commodity prices. Further, when the shocks are related to the rate of growth of world industrial production as an indicator of business cycle movements, the results suggest that the impact of the business cycle is self-stabilizing in that there is an initial positive effect on growth in commodity prices followed by a fully offsetting negative effect.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:06:30Z
format Working Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-41205
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:06:30Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Centre for Research in Applied Economics, Curtin Business School
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-412052017-01-30T14:49:04Z Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks? Bloch, Harry Fraser, P. MacDonald, Garry commodity prices shocks business cycle industrial production We consider the response of both nominal and real commodity prices on world markets to real and nominal shocks by hypothesizing that nominal shocks can permanently affect nominal commodity prices, but can have only temporary effect on real commodity prices. Real shocks, in contrast, can have permanent as well as temporary effects on both nominal and real commodity prices. When nominal and real shocks are decomposed in this manner, real shocks are found to be of much greater importance to the observed movements in commodity prices. Further, when the shocks are related to the rate of growth of world industrial production as an indicator of business cycle movements, the results suggest that the impact of the business cycle is self-stabilizing in that there is an initial positive effect on growth in commodity prices followed by a fully offsetting negative effect. 2009 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41205 Centre for Research in Applied Economics, Curtin Business School fulltext
spellingShingle commodity prices
shocks
business cycle
industrial production
Bloch, Harry
Fraser, P.
MacDonald, Garry
Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?
title Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?
title_full Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?
title_fullStr Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?
title_full_unstemmed Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?
title_short Commodity prices: How important are real and nominal shocks?
title_sort commodity prices: how important are real and nominal shocks?
topic commodity prices
shocks
business cycle
industrial production
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41205