Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study

Aim: To assess consensus among public health nutrition (PHN) workforce development stakeholders on the competencies required for effective PHN practice in the Australian workforce context. Methods: A modified Delphi study involving two iterative survey rounds among an expert panel of 33 Australian P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hughes, R., Begley, Andrea, Yeatman, H.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40769
_version_ 1848755959919280128
author Hughes, R.
Begley, Andrea
Yeatman, H.
author_facet Hughes, R.
Begley, Andrea
Yeatman, H.
author_sort Hughes, R.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: To assess consensus among public health nutrition (PHN) workforce development stakeholders on the competencies required for effective PHN practice in the Australian workforce context. Methods: A modified Delphi study involving two iterative survey rounds among an expert panel of 33 Australian PHN workforce development stakeholders. Surveys tested panellist ratings (essential, useful, irrelevant) of a listing of 143 competency elements derived from the literature and existing competency standards, across two survey rounds, with feedback between rounds. An arbitrary consensus cut-off of 67% was applied with <10% change between rounds or 100% agreement interpreted as agreement stability. Results: A total of 109 competency elements from the total list of 143 were rated as essential above the consensus cut-off, representing 76% of the original list. Thirty-three (33) elements were rated as essential by 100% of panellists. Approximately 90% or more of the competency elements tested were retained using the 67% cut-off across nutrition science, nutrition communication, professional communication, capacity building and intervention management competency units. Competency elements rated as essential beyond the consensus cut-off concentrated in the practice competency units of nutrition assessment, monitoring and surveillance, capacity building, and intervention management. Conclusions: The results provide an empirical basis for future nutrition curriculum renewal and workforce development innovations and challenge the assumption that existing dietetic workforce preparation based on meeting entry-level competencies is adequate for community and PHN practice.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:04:36Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-40769
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:04:36Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-407692017-09-13T14:03:54Z Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study Hughes, R. Begley, Andrea Yeatman, H. workforce development consensus competency standards Aim: To assess consensus among public health nutrition (PHN) workforce development stakeholders on the competencies required for effective PHN practice in the Australian workforce context. Methods: A modified Delphi study involving two iterative survey rounds among an expert panel of 33 Australian PHN workforce development stakeholders. Surveys tested panellist ratings (essential, useful, irrelevant) of a listing of 143 competency elements derived from the literature and existing competency standards, across two survey rounds, with feedback between rounds. An arbitrary consensus cut-off of 67% was applied with <10% change between rounds or 100% agreement interpreted as agreement stability. Results: A total of 109 competency elements from the total list of 143 were rated as essential above the consensus cut-off, representing 76% of the original list. Thirty-three (33) elements were rated as essential by 100% of panellists. Approximately 90% or more of the competency elements tested were retained using the 67% cut-off across nutrition science, nutrition communication, professional communication, capacity building and intervention management competency units. Competency elements rated as essential beyond the consensus cut-off concentrated in the practice competency units of nutrition assessment, monitoring and surveillance, capacity building, and intervention management. Conclusions: The results provide an empirical basis for future nutrition curriculum renewal and workforce development innovations and challenge the assumption that existing dietetic workforce preparation based on meeting entry-level competencies is adequate for community and PHN practice. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40769 10.1111/1747-0080.12098 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia restricted
spellingShingle workforce development
consensus
competency standards
Hughes, R.
Begley, Andrea
Yeatman, H.
Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study
title Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study
title_full Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study
title_fullStr Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study
title_full_unstemmed Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study
title_short Aspirational Competency Expectations for Public Health Nutritionists in Australia: a Consensus Study
title_sort aspirational competency expectations for public health nutritionists in australia: a consensus study
topic workforce development
consensus
competency standards
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40769