Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease

Reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in both savings and anterograde interference in adaptation to a visuomotor rotation (cf. Huang et al., 2011). In Parkinson's disease (PD), dopamine dysfunction is known to impair reinforcement mechanisms, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leow, L., de Rugy, A., Loftus, Andrea, Hammond, G.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40614
_version_ 1848755918516256768
author Leow, L.
de Rugy, A.
Loftus, Andrea
Hammond, G.
author_facet Leow, L.
de Rugy, A.
Loftus, Andrea
Hammond, G.
author_sort Leow, L.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in both savings and anterograde interference in adaptation to a visuomotor rotation (cf. Huang et al., 2011). In Parkinson's disease (PD), dopamine dysfunction is known to impair reinforcement mechanisms, and could also affect use-dependent plasticity. Here, we assessed savings and anterograde interference in PD with an A1-B-A2 paradigm in which movement repetition was (1) favored by the use of a single-target, and (2) manipulated through the amount of initial training. PD patients and controls completed either limited or extended training in A1 where they adapted movement to a 30° counter-clockwise rotation of visual feedback of the movement trajectory, and then adapted to a 30° clockwise rotation in B. After subsequent washout, participants readapted to the first 30° counter-clockwise rotation in A2. Controls showed significant anterograde interference from A1 to B only after extended training, and significant A1-B-A2 savings after both limited and extended training. However, despite similar A1 adaptation to controls, PD patients showed neither anterograde interference nor savings. That extended training was necessary in controls to elicit anterograde interference but not savings suggests that savings and anterograde interference do not result from equal contributions of the same underlying mechanism(s). It is suggested that use-dependent plasticity mechanisms contributes to anterograde interference but not to savings, while reinforcement mechanisms contribute to both. As both savings and anterograde interference were impaired in PD, dopamine dysfunction in PD might impair both reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms during adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:56Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-40614
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:56Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-406142017-09-13T14:08:49Z Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease Leow, L. de Rugy, A. Loftus, Andrea Hammond, G. Reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in both savings and anterograde interference in adaptation to a visuomotor rotation (cf. Huang et al., 2011). In Parkinson's disease (PD), dopamine dysfunction is known to impair reinforcement mechanisms, and could also affect use-dependent plasticity. Here, we assessed savings and anterograde interference in PD with an A1-B-A2 paradigm in which movement repetition was (1) favored by the use of a single-target, and (2) manipulated through the amount of initial training. PD patients and controls completed either limited or extended training in A1 where they adapted movement to a 30° counter-clockwise rotation of visual feedback of the movement trajectory, and then adapted to a 30° clockwise rotation in B. After subsequent washout, participants readapted to the first 30° counter-clockwise rotation in A2. Controls showed significant anterograde interference from A1 to B only after extended training, and significant A1-B-A2 savings after both limited and extended training. However, despite similar A1 adaptation to controls, PD patients showed neither anterograde interference nor savings. That extended training was necessary in controls to elicit anterograde interference but not savings suggests that savings and anterograde interference do not result from equal contributions of the same underlying mechanism(s). It is suggested that use-dependent plasticity mechanisms contributes to anterograde interference but not to savings, while reinforcement mechanisms contribute to both. As both savings and anterograde interference were impaired in PD, dopamine dysfunction in PD might impair both reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms during adaptation to a visuomotor rotation. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40614 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00055 Frontiers in Human Neuroscience fulltext
spellingShingle Leow, L.
de Rugy, A.
Loftus, Andrea
Hammond, G.
Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease
title Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease
title_full Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease
title_fullStr Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease
title_full_unstemmed Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease
title_short Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson's disease
title_sort different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in parkinson's disease
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40614