Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?

I spent four years of my life either writing and/or editing a vegetation survey of Austria (Mucina et al. 1993). Our team (Georg Grabherr, Tom Ellmauer, Susi Wallnöfer and myself) agreed to use the Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature, 2nd ed. (the Code, Barkman et al. 1986) to revise the nomencla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mucina, Ladislav
Format: Journal Article
Published: 1997
Online Access:http://www.jstor.org/stable/4181559
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40609
_version_ 1848755917385891840
author Mucina, Ladislav
author_facet Mucina, Ladislav
author_sort Mucina, Ladislav
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description I spent four years of my life either writing and/or editing a vegetation survey of Austria (Mucina et al. 1993). Our team (Georg Grabherr, Tom Ellmauer, Susi Wallnöfer and myself) agreed to use the Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature, 2nd ed. (the Code, Barkman et al. 1986) to revise the nomenclature of old syntaxa and for the description of new ones. Here I summarise my experience with this undertaking in an attempt to interpret it in a more general context. A new version of the Code is presently being prepared. Therefore I cannot resist commenting on the idea of the Code per se, as well as on developments to come, hoping they will not come true. There is no way that I can avoid being personal as the major source of the ideas presented below is based on my own experience. It is, therefore, I who am ready and willing to bear the consequences of this essay.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:55Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-40609
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:55Z
publishDate 1997
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-406092017-10-02T02:27:09Z Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature? Mucina, Ladislav I spent four years of my life either writing and/or editing a vegetation survey of Austria (Mucina et al. 1993). Our team (Georg Grabherr, Tom Ellmauer, Susi Wallnöfer and myself) agreed to use the Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature, 2nd ed. (the Code, Barkman et al. 1986) to revise the nomenclature of old syntaxa and for the description of new ones. Here I summarise my experience with this undertaking in an attempt to interpret it in a more general context. A new version of the Code is presently being prepared. Therefore I cannot resist commenting on the idea of the Code per se, as well as on developments to come, hoping they will not come true. There is no way that I can avoid being personal as the major source of the ideas presented below is based on my own experience. It is, therefore, I who am ready and willing to bear the consequences of this essay. 1997 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40609 http://www.jstor.org/stable/4181559 restricted
spellingShingle Mucina, Ladislav
Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?
title Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?
title_full Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?
title_fullStr Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?
title_full_unstemmed Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?
title_short Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?
title_sort quo vadis code of phytosociological nomenclature?
url http://www.jstor.org/stable/4181559
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40609