The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care

Quality palliative care depends on a deep understanding of distress facing patients nearing death. Yet, many aspects of psychosocial, existential and spiritual distress are often overlooked. The aim of this study was to test a novel psychometric—the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI)—designed to measur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chochinov, H., Hassard, T., McClement, S., Hack, T., Kristjanson, Linda, Harlos, M., Sinclair, S., Murray, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40606
_version_ 1848755916542836736
author Chochinov, H.
Hassard, T.
McClement, S.
Hack, T.
Kristjanson, Linda
Harlos, M.
Sinclair, S.
Murray, A.
author_facet Chochinov, H.
Hassard, T.
McClement, S.
Hack, T.
Kristjanson, Linda
Harlos, M.
Sinclair, S.
Murray, A.
author_sort Chochinov, H.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Quality palliative care depends on a deep understanding of distress facing patients nearing death. Yet, many aspects of psychosocial, existential and spiritual distress are often overlooked. The aim of this study was to test a novel psychometric—the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI)—designed to measure various sources of dignity-related distress among patients nearing the end of life. Using standard instrument development techniques, this study examined the face validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, factor structure and concurrent validity of the PDI. The 25-items of the PDI derive from a model of dignity in the terminally ill. To establish its basic psychometric properties, the PDI was administered to 253 patients receiving palliative care, along with other measures addressing issues identified within the Dignity Model in the Terminally Ill. Cronbach's coefficient alpha for the PDI was 0.93; the test–retest reliability was r = 0.85. Factor analysis resulted in a five-factor solution; factor labels include Symptom Distress, Existential Distress, Dependency, Peace of Mind, and Social Support, accounting for 58% of the overall variance. Evidence for concurrent validity was reported by way of significant associations between PDI factors and concurrent measures of distress. The PDI is a valid and reliable new instrument, which could assist clinicians to routinely detect end-of-life dignity-related distress. Identifying these sources of distress is a critical step toward understanding human suffering and should help clinicians deliver quality, dignity-conserving end-of-life care.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:54Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-40606
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:54Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-406062017-09-13T21:30:38Z The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care Chochinov, H. Hassard, T. McClement, S. Hack, T. Kristjanson, Linda Harlos, M. Sinclair, S. Murray, A. Palliative care Quality palliative care depends on a deep understanding of distress facing patients nearing death. Yet, many aspects of psychosocial, existential and spiritual distress are often overlooked. The aim of this study was to test a novel psychometric—the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI)—designed to measure various sources of dignity-related distress among patients nearing the end of life. Using standard instrument development techniques, this study examined the face validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, factor structure and concurrent validity of the PDI. The 25-items of the PDI derive from a model of dignity in the terminally ill. To establish its basic psychometric properties, the PDI was administered to 253 patients receiving palliative care, along with other measures addressing issues identified within the Dignity Model in the Terminally Ill. Cronbach's coefficient alpha for the PDI was 0.93; the test–retest reliability was r = 0.85. Factor analysis resulted in a five-factor solution; factor labels include Symptom Distress, Existential Distress, Dependency, Peace of Mind, and Social Support, accounting for 58% of the overall variance. Evidence for concurrent validity was reported by way of significant associations between PDI factors and concurrent measures of distress. The PDI is a valid and reliable new instrument, which could assist clinicians to routinely detect end-of-life dignity-related distress. Identifying these sources of distress is a critical step toward understanding human suffering and should help clinicians deliver quality, dignity-conserving end-of-life care. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40606 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.018 Elsevier restricted
spellingShingle Palliative care
Chochinov, H.
Hassard, T.
McClement, S.
Hack, T.
Kristjanson, Linda
Harlos, M.
Sinclair, S.
Murray, A.
The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care
title The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care
title_full The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care
title_fullStr The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care
title_full_unstemmed The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care
title_short The Patient Dignity Inventory: A Novel Way of Measuring Dignity-Related Distress in Palliative Care
title_sort patient dignity inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care
topic Palliative care
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40606