Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration

Research integrity is core to the mission of higher education. In undergraduate student samples, self-reported rates of data fabrication have been troublingly high. Despite this, no research has investigated undergraduate data fabrication in a more systematic manner. We applied duplication screening...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allen, Peter, Lourenco, A., Roberts, Lynne
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40539
_version_ 1848755898727530496
author Allen, Peter
Lourenco, A.
Roberts, Lynne
author_facet Allen, Peter
Lourenco, A.
Roberts, Lynne
author_sort Allen, Peter
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Research integrity is core to the mission of higher education. In undergraduate student samples, self-reported rates of data fabrication have been troublingly high. Despite this, no research has investigated undergraduate data fabrication in a more systematic manner. We applied duplication screening techniques to 18 data sets submitted by psychology honors students for assessment. Although we did not identify any completely duplicated cases, there were numerous partial duplicates. Rather than indicating fabrication, however, these partial duplicates are likely a consequence of poor measure selection, insufficient data screening, and/or participant characteristics. Implications for the teaching and supervision of honors students are discussed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:37Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-40539
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:03:37Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-405392020-07-22T08:23:50Z Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration Allen, Peter Lourenco, A. Roberts, Lynne Research integrity is core to the mission of higher education. In undergraduate student samples, self-reported rates of data fabrication have been troublingly high. Despite this, no research has investigated undergraduate data fabrication in a more systematic manner. We applied duplication screening techniques to 18 data sets submitted by psychology honors students for assessment. Although we did not identify any completely duplicated cases, there were numerous partial duplicates. Rather than indicating fabrication, however, these partial duplicates are likely a consequence of poor measure selection, insufficient data screening, and/or participant characteristics. Implications for the teaching and supervision of honors students are discussed. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40539 10.1080/10508422.2015.1019070 Routledge fulltext
spellingShingle Allen, Peter
Lourenco, A.
Roberts, Lynne
Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration
title Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration
title_full Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration
title_fullStr Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration
title_short Detecting Duplication in Students’ Research Data: A Method and Illustration
title_sort detecting duplication in students’ research data: a method and illustration
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40539