The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement

Purpose: Within supervised rehabilitation programs, Lent and Lopez (2002) proposed that clients and therapists develop a “tripartite” network of efficacy beliefs, comprising their confidence in their own ability, their confidence in the other person’s ability, and their estimation of the other perso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jackson, B., Dimmock, J., Taylor, I., Hagger, Martin
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Psychological Association 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39479
_version_ 1848755602238472192
author Jackson, B.
Dimmock, J.
Taylor, I.
Hagger, Martin
author_facet Jackson, B.
Dimmock, J.
Taylor, I.
Hagger, Martin
author_sort Jackson, B.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose: Within supervised rehabilitation programs, Lent and Lopez (2002) proposed that clients and therapists develop a “tripartite” network of efficacy beliefs, comprising their confidence in their own ability, their confidence in the other person’s ability, and their estimation of the other person’s confidence in them. To date, researchers have yet to explore the potential relational outcomes associated with this model in rehabilitation contexts. Method: In Study 1, we recruited 170 exercise clients (M age = 63.73, SD = 6.46) who were enrolled in a one-to-one aerobic exercise program with a therapist as a result of a lower-limb musculoskeletal disorder. Clients reported their tripartite efficacy beliefs and perceptions about the quality of their relationship with their therapist, and respective therapists rated each client’s engagement in his or her exercise program. In Study 2, we recruited 68 separate exercise clients (M age = 65.93 SD = 5.80) along with their therapists (n = 68, M age = 31.89, SD = 4.79) from the same program, to examine whether individuals’ efficacy perceptions were related to their own and/or the other person’s relationship quality perceptions.Results: In Study 1, each of the tripartite efficacy constructs displayed positive direct effects with respect to clients’ relationship quality appraisals, as well as indirect effects in relation to program engagement. Actor partner interdependence modeling in Study 2 demonstrated that clients and therapists reported more adaptive relationship perceptions when they themselves held strong tripartite efficacy beliefs (i.e., actor effects), and that clients viewed their relationship in a more positive light when their therapist was highly confident in the client’s ability (i.e., partner effect). Conclusion: These findings underscore the potential utility of the tripartite efficacy framework in relation to motivational and relational processes within supervised exercise programs.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:55Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-39479
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:55Z
publishDate 2012
publisher American Psychological Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-394792017-09-13T16:05:06Z The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement Jackson, B. Dimmock, J. Taylor, I. Hagger, Martin self-efficacy relation-inferred self-efficacy APIM osteoarthritis other-efficacy Purpose: Within supervised rehabilitation programs, Lent and Lopez (2002) proposed that clients and therapists develop a “tripartite” network of efficacy beliefs, comprising their confidence in their own ability, their confidence in the other person’s ability, and their estimation of the other person’s confidence in them. To date, researchers have yet to explore the potential relational outcomes associated with this model in rehabilitation contexts. Method: In Study 1, we recruited 170 exercise clients (M age = 63.73, SD = 6.46) who were enrolled in a one-to-one aerobic exercise program with a therapist as a result of a lower-limb musculoskeletal disorder. Clients reported their tripartite efficacy beliefs and perceptions about the quality of their relationship with their therapist, and respective therapists rated each client’s engagement in his or her exercise program. In Study 2, we recruited 68 separate exercise clients (M age = 65.93 SD = 5.80) along with their therapists (n = 68, M age = 31.89, SD = 4.79) from the same program, to examine whether individuals’ efficacy perceptions were related to their own and/or the other person’s relationship quality perceptions.Results: In Study 1, each of the tripartite efficacy constructs displayed positive direct effects with respect to clients’ relationship quality appraisals, as well as indirect effects in relation to program engagement. Actor partner interdependence modeling in Study 2 demonstrated that clients and therapists reported more adaptive relationship perceptions when they themselves held strong tripartite efficacy beliefs (i.e., actor effects), and that clients viewed their relationship in a more positive light when their therapist was highly confident in the client’s ability (i.e., partner effect). Conclusion: These findings underscore the potential utility of the tripartite efficacy framework in relation to motivational and relational processes within supervised exercise programs. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39479 10.1037/a0030062 American Psychological Association fulltext
spellingShingle self-efficacy
relation-inferred self-efficacy
APIM
osteoarthritis
other-efficacy
Jackson, B.
Dimmock, J.
Taylor, I.
Hagger, Martin
The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
title The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
title_full The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
title_fullStr The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
title_full_unstemmed The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
title_short The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
title_sort tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: implications for relationship quality and client engagement
topic self-efficacy
relation-inferred self-efficacy
APIM
osteoarthritis
other-efficacy
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39479