Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives

Our study examines linkages between discretionary accruals, management ownership and remuneration and non-audit service (NAS) fees. All findings for our study are based on an extensive analysis of 351 Singapore publicly listed firms for the 2001 fiscal year period. Inferential statistics results usi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Van der Zahn, J-L., Tower, Greg
Format: Journal Article
Published: Virtus Interpress 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39460
_version_ 1848755596880248832
author Van der Zahn, J-L.
Tower, Greg
author_facet Van der Zahn, J-L.
Tower, Greg
author_sort Van der Zahn, J-L.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Our study examines linkages between discretionary accruals, management ownership and remuneration and non-audit service (NAS) fees. All findings for our study are based on an extensive analysis of 351 Singapore publicly listed firms for the 2001 fiscal year period. Inferential statistics results using OLS and 2SLS reveals three key findings. First, there is a negative association between discretionary accruals and NAS fees. Second, managerial ownership positively affects the negative association between discretionary accruals and NAS fees. Third, this positive affect is weaker amongst firms with high accounting-based management remuneration. Our study also documents that when using single-equation estimates audit committee effectiveness is found to have a significant positive (negative) influence on audit coverage (purchase NAS fees). After controlling for fee endogeneity, however, the evidence shows that audit committee effectiveness is not associated with purchase of either audit or NAS fees. Findings from single-equation models of audit and NAS fees confirm prior research showing a knowledge spillover effect. Consistent with emerging literature, however, we show that when using simultaneous-equations the association between audit and NASs fees suffers from simultaneous-equation bias. Thus, consistent with Whisenant et al., (2003) we conclude there is no knowledge spillover between the two fees. Another key feature of this paper is we expand the very limited literature investigating linkages between audit committee effectiveness and the two fees. We document a failure to control for the feedback relationship between the two fee types is likely to produce spurious findings and inferences.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:49Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-39460
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:49Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Virtus Interpress
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-394602017-01-30T14:34:10Z Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives Van der Zahn, J-L. Tower, Greg committee data audit selection corporate governance Our study examines linkages between discretionary accruals, management ownership and remuneration and non-audit service (NAS) fees. All findings for our study are based on an extensive analysis of 351 Singapore publicly listed firms for the 2001 fiscal year period. Inferential statistics results using OLS and 2SLS reveals three key findings. First, there is a negative association between discretionary accruals and NAS fees. Second, managerial ownership positively affects the negative association between discretionary accruals and NAS fees. Third, this positive affect is weaker amongst firms with high accounting-based management remuneration. Our study also documents that when using single-equation estimates audit committee effectiveness is found to have a significant positive (negative) influence on audit coverage (purchase NAS fees). After controlling for fee endogeneity, however, the evidence shows that audit committee effectiveness is not associated with purchase of either audit or NAS fees. Findings from single-equation models of audit and NAS fees confirm prior research showing a knowledge spillover effect. Consistent with emerging literature, however, we show that when using simultaneous-equations the association between audit and NASs fees suffers from simultaneous-equation bias. Thus, consistent with Whisenant et al., (2003) we conclude there is no knowledge spillover between the two fees. Another key feature of this paper is we expand the very limited literature investigating linkages between audit committee effectiveness and the two fees. We document a failure to control for the feedback relationship between the two fee types is likely to produce spurious findings and inferences. 2006 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39460 Virtus Interpress fulltext
spellingShingle committee
data
audit
selection
corporate governance
Van der Zahn, J-L.
Tower, Greg
Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
title Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
title_full Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
title_fullStr Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
title_full_unstemmed Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
title_short Fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
title_sort fee endogeneity, discretionary accruals and managerial incentives
topic committee
data
audit
selection
corporate governance
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39460