Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices

AIMS: There is a long-standing discussion about whether some beverages are more likely to be linked with high-risk drinking and damage than others, and implications for beverage specific alcohol policies. While the evidence is inconclusive, when controlling for individual consumption, some studies h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giesbrecht, N., Wettlaufer, A., Walker, E., Ialomiteanu, A., Stockwell, Tim
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39363
_version_ 1848755571909459968
author Giesbrecht, N.
Wettlaufer, A.
Walker, E.
Ialomiteanu, A.
Stockwell, Tim
author_facet Giesbrecht, N.
Wettlaufer, A.
Walker, E.
Ialomiteanu, A.
Stockwell, Tim
author_sort Giesbrecht, N.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description AIMS: There is a long-standing discussion about whether some beverages are more likely to be linked with high-risk drinking and damage than others, and implications for beverage specific alcohol policies. While the evidence is inconclusive, when controlling for individual consumption, some studies have shown elevated risks by beverage type. This paper examines the situation in Ontario, Canada, from 1995 to present (2011) on several dimensions in order to assess the differences by beverage and their rationale with a specific focus on the most recent policies. METHODS: This paper draws on archival consumption statistics, taxation and pricing arrangements, and retailing and marketing practices. RESULTS: Off-premise sales, which represent an estimated 75% of ethanol, involve several channels: stores controlled by the Liquor Control Board (LCBO) - which sell all spirits, imported and domestic wines, and beer products; the Beer Store network which sell all beers; and Ontario winery stores - which sell Ontario wines. In LCBO stores Ontario wines are more prominently displayed than other beverages, and extensive print advertising tends to feature wine over beer and spirits. There are also differences by beverage in terms of taxation and price. The taxes on higher alcohol content beverage types account for a higher portion of the retail price than taxes on lower alcohol content beverage types. Furthermore, minimum price regulations allow for differential minimum pricing per standard drink [17.05 ml ethanol] across beverage types. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent rationale for these arrangements is not primarily that of favouring lighter-strength beverages in order to reduce harm, but rather to accommodate long-standing vested interests which are primarily financially based.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:26Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-39363
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:26Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-393632018-06-15T03:51:04Z Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices Giesbrecht, N. Wettlaufer, A. Walker, E. Ialomiteanu, A. Stockwell, Tim AIMS: There is a long-standing discussion about whether some beverages are more likely to be linked with high-risk drinking and damage than others, and implications for beverage specific alcohol policies. While the evidence is inconclusive, when controlling for individual consumption, some studies have shown elevated risks by beverage type. This paper examines the situation in Ontario, Canada, from 1995 to present (2011) on several dimensions in order to assess the differences by beverage and their rationale with a specific focus on the most recent policies. METHODS: This paper draws on archival consumption statistics, taxation and pricing arrangements, and retailing and marketing practices. RESULTS: Off-premise sales, which represent an estimated 75% of ethanol, involve several channels: stores controlled by the Liquor Control Board (LCBO) - which sell all spirits, imported and domestic wines, and beer products; the Beer Store network which sell all beers; and Ontario winery stores - which sell Ontario wines. In LCBO stores Ontario wines are more prominently displayed than other beverages, and extensive print advertising tends to feature wine over beer and spirits. There are also differences by beverage in terms of taxation and price. The taxes on higher alcohol content beverage types account for a higher portion of the retail price than taxes on lower alcohol content beverage types. Furthermore, minimum price regulations allow for differential minimum pricing per standard drink [17.05 ml ethanol] across beverage types. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent rationale for these arrangements is not primarily that of favouring lighter-strength beverages in order to reduce harm, but rather to accommodate long-standing vested interests which are primarily financially based. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39363 10.2478/v10199-012-0006-y http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Giesbrecht, N.
Wettlaufer, A.
Walker, E.
Ialomiteanu, A.
Stockwell, Tim
Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
title Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
title_full Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
title_fullStr Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
title_full_unstemmed Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
title_short Beer, wine and distilled spirits in Ontario: A comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
title_sort beer, wine and distilled spirits in ontario: a comparison of recent policies, regulations and practices
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39363