A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes

This study aims to compare at lab-scale the rejection efficiency of several reverse osmosis membranes (RO) toward arsenic (III) and boron during the filtration of a synthetic brackish water. The effect of pH and operating conditions on the rejection of each RO membrane was studied. Two types of memb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teychene, B., Collet, G., Gallard, H., Croue, Jean-Philippe
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39301
_version_ 1848755554156019712
author Teychene, B.
Collet, G.
Gallard, H.
Croue, Jean-Philippe
author_facet Teychene, B.
Collet, G.
Gallard, H.
Croue, Jean-Philippe
author_sort Teychene, B.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study aims to compare at lab-scale the rejection efficiency of several reverse osmosis membranes (RO) toward arsenic (III) and boron during the filtration of a synthetic brackish water. The effect of pH and operating conditions on the rejection of each RO membrane was studied. Two types of membrane were investigated: “brackish water” and “sea water” membranes.Our results showed that the metalloid rejection depends on the membrane type, pH and transmembrane pressure applied. Increasing pH above the dissociation constant (pKa) of each specie improves significantly the metalloid rejection by RO membranes, whatever the membrane type. Moreover, at identical operating conditions (pH, transmembrane pressure), results showed that the brackish water membranes have a higher water flux and exhibit lower metalloid rejection. The highest As(III) rejection value for the tested brackish water membranes was 99% obtained at pH = 9.6 and 40 bars, whereas it was found that the sea water RO membranes could highly reject As(III), more than 99%, even at low pH and low pressure (pH = 7.6 and 24 bars).Regarding Boron rejection, similar conclusions could be drawn. The sea water RO membranes exert higher removal, with a high rejection value above 96% over the tested conditions. More generally, this study showed that, whatever the operating conditions or the tested membranes, the boron and As(III) permeate concentrations are below the WHO guidelines. In addition, new data about the boron and arsenic permeability of each tested RO membrane was brought thanks to a theoretical calculation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:09Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-39301
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:58:09Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-393012017-09-13T14:26:49Z A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes Teychene, B. Collet, G. Gallard, H. Croue, Jean-Philippe This study aims to compare at lab-scale the rejection efficiency of several reverse osmosis membranes (RO) toward arsenic (III) and boron during the filtration of a synthetic brackish water. The effect of pH and operating conditions on the rejection of each RO membrane was studied. Two types of membrane were investigated: “brackish water” and “sea water” membranes.Our results showed that the metalloid rejection depends on the membrane type, pH and transmembrane pressure applied. Increasing pH above the dissociation constant (pKa) of each specie improves significantly the metalloid rejection by RO membranes, whatever the membrane type. Moreover, at identical operating conditions (pH, transmembrane pressure), results showed that the brackish water membranes have a higher water flux and exhibit lower metalloid rejection. The highest As(III) rejection value for the tested brackish water membranes was 99% obtained at pH = 9.6 and 40 bars, whereas it was found that the sea water RO membranes could highly reject As(III), more than 99%, even at low pH and low pressure (pH = 7.6 and 24 bars).Regarding Boron rejection, similar conclusions could be drawn. The sea water RO membranes exert higher removal, with a high rejection value above 96% over the tested conditions. More generally, this study showed that, whatever the operating conditions or the tested membranes, the boron and As(III) permeate concentrations are below the WHO guidelines. In addition, new data about the boron and arsenic permeability of each tested RO membrane was brought thanks to a theoretical calculation. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39301 10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.034 restricted
spellingShingle Teychene, B.
Collet, G.
Gallard, H.
Croue, Jean-Philippe
A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
title A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
title_full A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
title_fullStr A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
title_short A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
title_sort comparative study of boron and arsenic (iii) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/39301