Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health

Background: Urinary incontinence is a common health problem with significant medical, psychological and economic burdens. Health education is capable of improving perceptions about and attitudes towards incontinence in turn encouraging them to seek help. Aim: The aim of the present study was to dete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tuckett, A., Hodgkinson, B., Hegney, Desley, Paterson, J., Kralik, D.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Blackwell Publishing 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38806
_version_ 1848755419682439168
author Tuckett, A.
Hodgkinson, B.
Hegney, Desley
Paterson, J.
Kralik, D.
author_facet Tuckett, A.
Hodgkinson, B.
Hegney, Desley
Paterson, J.
Kralik, D.
author_sort Tuckett, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Urinary incontinence is a common health problem with significant medical, psychological and economic burdens. Health education is capable of improving perceptions about and attitudes towards incontinence in turn encouraging them to seek help. Aim: The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of educational interventions at raising men's awareness of bladder and bowel health. Inclusion criteria: Types of participants. Adult and adolescent men (age 12 years and over) and it was anticipated that some interventions/promotions may be directed at family members or carers of, and health professionals caring for, adult men and therefore these would also be considered for inclusion. Types of intervention. Any intervention, program or action that provided information, or attempted to raise awareness of men's bladder and bowel health. Type of outcome. Any measure defined by included studies such as: bladder and bowel management and treatment, increased knowledge of bladder and bowel health and number of attendees at promotion. Type of studies. Concurrent controls, such as: systematic reviews of concurrently controlled trials, meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before after designs and observational design (cohort, case–control). Search strategy. A search for published and unpublished studies in the English language was undertaken restricted by a publication date of 10 years prior, with the exception of a review of seminal papers before this time. Methodological quality: Each study was appraised independently by two reviewers using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute instruments.Data collection and analysis: Information was extracted from studies meeting quality criteria using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute tools. For two studies with similar population types, interventions and outcomes quantitative results were combined into a meta-analysis using Revman 5.0 software. However, the majority of studies were heterogenous and results are presented in a narrative form. Results: With the exception of instruction for pelvic floor muscle exercises for men after prostatectomy, little quantitative research has been performed that establishes the effectiveness of interventions on men's awareness of bladder and bowel health. While numerous interventions have been trialled on mixed gender populations, and these trials suggest that the interventions would be effective, their effectiveness on the male component cannot be definitively established. Conclusion: There is little quantitative evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to improve men's awareness of bladder and bowel health therefore few recommendations can be made. Well-designed controlled trials using male sample populations only are needed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:56:01Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-38806
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:56:01Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Blackwell Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-388062017-09-13T15:59:12Z Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health Tuckett, A. Hodgkinson, B. Hegney, Desley Paterson, J. Kralik, D. bowel men education bladder systematic review Background: Urinary incontinence is a common health problem with significant medical, psychological and economic burdens. Health education is capable of improving perceptions about and attitudes towards incontinence in turn encouraging them to seek help. Aim: The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of educational interventions at raising men's awareness of bladder and bowel health. Inclusion criteria: Types of participants. Adult and adolescent men (age 12 years and over) and it was anticipated that some interventions/promotions may be directed at family members or carers of, and health professionals caring for, adult men and therefore these would also be considered for inclusion. Types of intervention. Any intervention, program or action that provided information, or attempted to raise awareness of men's bladder and bowel health. Type of outcome. Any measure defined by included studies such as: bladder and bowel management and treatment, increased knowledge of bladder and bowel health and number of attendees at promotion. Type of studies. Concurrent controls, such as: systematic reviews of concurrently controlled trials, meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before after designs and observational design (cohort, case–control). Search strategy. A search for published and unpublished studies in the English language was undertaken restricted by a publication date of 10 years prior, with the exception of a review of seminal papers before this time. Methodological quality: Each study was appraised independently by two reviewers using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute instruments.Data collection and analysis: Information was extracted from studies meeting quality criteria using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute tools. For two studies with similar population types, interventions and outcomes quantitative results were combined into a meta-analysis using Revman 5.0 software. However, the majority of studies were heterogenous and results are presented in a narrative form. Results: With the exception of instruction for pelvic floor muscle exercises for men after prostatectomy, little quantitative research has been performed that establishes the effectiveness of interventions on men's awareness of bladder and bowel health. While numerous interventions have been trialled on mixed gender populations, and these trials suggest that the interventions would be effective, their effectiveness on the male component cannot be definitively established. Conclusion: There is little quantitative evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to improve men's awareness of bladder and bowel health therefore few recommendations can be made. Well-designed controlled trials using male sample populations only are needed. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38806 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00208.x Blackwell Publishing restricted
spellingShingle bowel
men
education
bladder
systematic review
Tuckett, A.
Hodgkinson, B.
Hegney, Desley
Paterson, J.
Kralik, D.
Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
title Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
title_full Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
title_fullStr Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
title_short Effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
title_sort effectiveness of educational interventions to raise men's awareness of bladder and bowel health
topic bowel
men
education
bladder
systematic review
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38806