Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy

Despite the great potential videoconferencing holds for providing psychotherapy services to a wide range of individuals, it is presently underused by psychologists. Do psychologists hold negative attitudes that interfere with their willingness to use the technology? What do psychologists think about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rees, Clare, Stone, Sheona
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Psychological Association 2005
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38554
_version_ 1848755351348838400
author Rees, Clare
Stone, Sheona
author_facet Rees, Clare
Stone, Sheona
author_sort Rees, Clare
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Despite the great potential videoconferencing holds for providing psychotherapy services to a wide range of individuals, it is presently underused by psychologists. Do psychologists hold negative attitudes that interfere with their willingness to use the technology? What do psychologists think about the impact of the technology on the therapeutic alliance? Thirty clinical psychologists were randomly assigned to watch an identical therapy session, either face-to-face or videoconferencing format. Our prediction that psychologists in the videoconferencing condition would rate the therapeutic alliance significantly lower than would psychologists in the face-to-face condition was supported. We discuss the need to develop appropriate therapist training and improve the general dissemination of information regarding videoconferencing as an important means by which to reduce negative attitudes toward the technology.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:54:55Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-38554
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:54:55Z
publishDate 2005
publisher American Psychological Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-385542017-09-13T16:03:35Z Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy Rees, Clare Stone, Sheona Despite the great potential videoconferencing holds for providing psychotherapy services to a wide range of individuals, it is presently underused by psychologists. Do psychologists hold negative attitudes that interfere with their willingness to use the technology? What do psychologists think about the impact of the technology on the therapeutic alliance? Thirty clinical psychologists were randomly assigned to watch an identical therapy session, either face-to-face or videoconferencing format. Our prediction that psychologists in the videoconferencing condition would rate the therapeutic alliance significantly lower than would psychologists in the face-to-face condition was supported. We discuss the need to develop appropriate therapist training and improve the general dissemination of information regarding videoconferencing as an important means by which to reduce negative attitudes toward the technology. 2005 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38554 10.1037/0735-7028.36.6.649 American Psychological Association restricted
spellingShingle Rees, Clare
Stone, Sheona
Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
title Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
title_full Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
title_fullStr Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
title_short Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
title_sort therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38554