Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy

© 2015 Mac Keith Press. Aim: To determine whether short-term intensive group-based therapy combining modified constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual therapy (hybrid-CIMT) is more effective than an equal total dose of distributed individualized occupational therapy (standard care) on upper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sakzewski, L., Miller, L., Ziviani, J., Abbott, D., Rose, S., Macdonell, R., Boyd, Roslyn
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38504
_version_ 1848755338269949952
author Sakzewski, L.
Miller, L.
Ziviani, J.
Abbott, D.
Rose, S.
Macdonell, R.
Boyd, Roslyn
author_facet Sakzewski, L.
Miller, L.
Ziviani, J.
Abbott, D.
Rose, S.
Macdonell, R.
Boyd, Roslyn
author_sort Sakzewski, L.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2015 Mac Keith Press. Aim: To determine whether short-term intensive group-based therapy combining modified constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual therapy (hybrid-CIMT) is more effective than an equal total dose of distributed individualized occupational therapy (standard care) on upper limb motor and individualized outcomes. Method: Fifty-three children with unilateral cerebral palsy (69% males; mean age 7y 10mo, SD 2y 4mo; Manual Ability Classification System level I, n=24; level II, n=23) were randomly allocated, and 44 received either hybrid-CIMT (n=25) or standard care (n=19). Standard care comprised six weekly occupational therapy sessions and a 12-week home programme. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks after treatment. Results: Groups were equivalent at baseline. Standard care achieved greater gains on satisfaction with occupational performance after intervention (estimated mean difference -1.2, 95% CI -2.2 to -0.1; p=0.04) and Assisting Hand Assessment at 26 weeks (estimated mean difference 3.1, 95% CI 0.2-6.0; p=0.04). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in dexterity of the impaired upper limb, and bimanual and occupational performance over time. The differences between groups were not clinically meaningful. Interpretation: There were no differences between the two models of therapy delivery. Group-based intensive camps may not be readily available; however, individualized standard care augmented with a home programme may offer an effective alternative but needs to be provided at a sufficient dose.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:54:43Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-38504
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:54:43Z
publishDate 2015
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-385042017-09-13T14:17:03Z Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy Sakzewski, L. Miller, L. Ziviani, J. Abbott, D. Rose, S. Macdonell, R. Boyd, Roslyn © 2015 Mac Keith Press. Aim: To determine whether short-term intensive group-based therapy combining modified constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual therapy (hybrid-CIMT) is more effective than an equal total dose of distributed individualized occupational therapy (standard care) on upper limb motor and individualized outcomes. Method: Fifty-three children with unilateral cerebral palsy (69% males; mean age 7y 10mo, SD 2y 4mo; Manual Ability Classification System level I, n=24; level II, n=23) were randomly allocated, and 44 received either hybrid-CIMT (n=25) or standard care (n=19). Standard care comprised six weekly occupational therapy sessions and a 12-week home programme. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks after treatment. Results: Groups were equivalent at baseline. Standard care achieved greater gains on satisfaction with occupational performance after intervention (estimated mean difference -1.2, 95% CI -2.2 to -0.1; p=0.04) and Assisting Hand Assessment at 26 weeks (estimated mean difference 3.1, 95% CI 0.2-6.0; p=0.04). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in dexterity of the impaired upper limb, and bimanual and occupational performance over time. The differences between groups were not clinically meaningful. Interpretation: There were no differences between the two models of therapy delivery. Group-based intensive camps may not be readily available; however, individualized standard care augmented with a home programme may offer an effective alternative but needs to be provided at a sufficient dose. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38504 10.1111/dmcn.12702 unknown
spellingShingle Sakzewski, L.
Miller, L.
Ziviani, J.
Abbott, D.
Rose, S.
Macdonell, R.
Boyd, Roslyn
Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
title Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
title_full Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
title_fullStr Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
title_full_unstemmed Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
title_short Randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
title_sort randomized comparison trial of density and context of upper limb intensive group versus individualized occupational therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38504