Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management

Objective: To describe the treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting (EDNV) in Australasia by Fellows of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (FACEM). To determine the influence of various factors on FACEM anti-emetic choice. To compare the influence of drug eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mee, M., Egerton-Warburton, Diana, Meek, R.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38081
_version_ 1848755222931832832
author Mee, M.
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
Meek, R.
author_facet Mee, M.
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
Meek, R.
author_sort Mee, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: To describe the treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting (EDNV) in Australasia by Fellows of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (FACEM). To determine the influence of various factors on FACEM anti-emetic choice. To compare the influence of drug effectiveness, side effects, cost and pharmacy directives on adult EDNV anti-emetic choice between FACEM choosing the two most common first-line agents. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all FACEM practising in Australasian ED was conducted by mail-out in February 2009. Results: Of all FACEM surveyed 48.7% (532/1092) responded. The most common first-line drugs for adult EDNV were metoclopramide (87.3%, 453/519), 5HT3 antagonists (7.9%, 41/519) and prochlorperazine (2.3%, 12/519). For paediatric EDNV, the most common first-line agents were 5HT3 antagonists (86.2%, 307/356), metoclopramide (6.7%, 24/356) and promethazine (5.1%, 18/356). For most FACEM anti-emetic choice was highly influenced by perceived drug efficacy (96.1%) and side effects (82.5%), and 32.9% of FACEM were highly influenced by drug cost. Few FACEM reported ED anti-emetic protocols for adults (13.0%) or children (16.7%) in their ED. FACEM seldom used scales or tools to measure EDNV severity in adult (2.5%) or paediatric (3.4%) patients. Conclusions: Fellows of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine anti-emetic choice in Australasian ED has been described. The main influences on anti-emetic choice were patient age, perceived drug efficacy and drug side-effect profiles.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:52:53Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-38081
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:52:53Z
publishDate 2011
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-380812017-09-13T14:13:04Z Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management Mee, M. Egerton-Warburton, Diana Meek, R. Objective: To describe the treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting (EDNV) in Australasia by Fellows of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (FACEM). To determine the influence of various factors on FACEM anti-emetic choice. To compare the influence of drug effectiveness, side effects, cost and pharmacy directives on adult EDNV anti-emetic choice between FACEM choosing the two most common first-line agents. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all FACEM practising in Australasian ED was conducted by mail-out in February 2009. Results: Of all FACEM surveyed 48.7% (532/1092) responded. The most common first-line drugs for adult EDNV were metoclopramide (87.3%, 453/519), 5HT3 antagonists (7.9%, 41/519) and prochlorperazine (2.3%, 12/519). For paediatric EDNV, the most common first-line agents were 5HT3 antagonists (86.2%, 307/356), metoclopramide (6.7%, 24/356) and promethazine (5.1%, 18/356). For most FACEM anti-emetic choice was highly influenced by perceived drug efficacy (96.1%) and side effects (82.5%), and 32.9% of FACEM were highly influenced by drug cost. Few FACEM reported ED anti-emetic protocols for adults (13.0%) or children (16.7%) in their ED. FACEM seldom used scales or tools to measure EDNV severity in adult (2.5%) or paediatric (3.4%) patients. Conclusions: Fellows of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine anti-emetic choice in Australasian ED has been described. The main influences on anti-emetic choice were patient age, perceived drug efficacy and drug side-effect profiles. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38081 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01386.x restricted
spellingShingle Mee, M.
Egerton-Warburton, Diana
Meek, R.
Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management
title Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management
title_full Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management
title_fullStr Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management
title_full_unstemmed Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management
title_short Treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in Australasia: A survey of anti-emetic management
title_sort treatment and assessment of emergency department nausea and vomiting in australasia: a survey of anti-emetic management
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38081