Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain
Background: Spinal posture is commonly a focus in the assessment and clinical management of low back pain (LBP) patients. However, the link between spinal posture and LBP is not fully understood. Recent evidence suggests that considering regional, rather than total lumbar spine posture is important....
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Biomed Central
2008
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38027 |
| _version_ | 1848755208211922944 |
|---|---|
| author | Mitchell, Tim O'Sullivan, Peter Burnett, Angus Straker, Leon Smith, Anne |
| author_facet | Mitchell, Tim O'Sullivan, Peter Burnett, Angus Straker, Leon Smith, Anne |
| author_sort | Mitchell, Tim |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background: Spinal posture is commonly a focus in the assessment and clinical management of low back pain (LBP) patients. However, the link between spinal posture and LBP is not fully understood. Recent evidence suggests that considering regional, rather than total lumbar spine posture is important. The purpose of this study was to determine; if there are regional differences in habitual lumbar spine posture and movement, and if these findings are influenced by LBP. Methods: One hundred and seventy female undergraduate nursing students, with and without LBP, participated in this cross-sectional study. Lower lumbar (LLx), Upper lumbar (ULx) and total lumbar (TLx) spine angles were measured using an electromagnetic tracking system in static postures and across a range of functional tasks.Results: Regional differences in lumbar posture and movement were found. Mean LLx posture did not correlate with ULx posture in sitting (r = 0.036, p = 0.638), but showed a moderate inverse correlation with ULx posture in usual standing (r = -0.505, p < 0.001). Regional differences in range of motion from reference postures in sitting and standing were evident. BMI accounted for regional differences found in all sitting and some standing measures. LBP was not associated with differences in regional lumbar spine angles or range of motion, with the exception of maximal backward bending range of motion (F = 5.18, p = 0.007). Conclusion: This study supports the concept of regional differences within the lumbar spine during common postures and movements. Global lumbar spine kinematics do not reflect regional lumbar spine kinematics, which has implications for interpretation of measures of spinal posture, motion and loading. BMI influenced regional lumbar posture and movement, possibly representing adaptation due to load. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:52:39Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-38027 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T08:52:39Z |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publisher | Biomed Central |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-380272017-09-13T14:09:28Z Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain Mitchell, Tim O'Sullivan, Peter Burnett, Angus Straker, Leon Smith, Anne Background: Spinal posture is commonly a focus in the assessment and clinical management of low back pain (LBP) patients. However, the link between spinal posture and LBP is not fully understood. Recent evidence suggests that considering regional, rather than total lumbar spine posture is important. The purpose of this study was to determine; if there are regional differences in habitual lumbar spine posture and movement, and if these findings are influenced by LBP. Methods: One hundred and seventy female undergraduate nursing students, with and without LBP, participated in this cross-sectional study. Lower lumbar (LLx), Upper lumbar (ULx) and total lumbar (TLx) spine angles were measured using an electromagnetic tracking system in static postures and across a range of functional tasks.Results: Regional differences in lumbar posture and movement were found. Mean LLx posture did not correlate with ULx posture in sitting (r = 0.036, p = 0.638), but showed a moderate inverse correlation with ULx posture in usual standing (r = -0.505, p < 0.001). Regional differences in range of motion from reference postures in sitting and standing were evident. BMI accounted for regional differences found in all sitting and some standing measures. LBP was not associated with differences in regional lumbar spine angles or range of motion, with the exception of maximal backward bending range of motion (F = 5.18, p = 0.007). Conclusion: This study supports the concept of regional differences within the lumbar spine during common postures and movements. Global lumbar spine kinematics do not reflect regional lumbar spine kinematics, which has implications for interpretation of measures of spinal posture, motion and loading. BMI influenced regional lumbar posture and movement, possibly representing adaptation due to load. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38027 10.1186/1471-2474-9-152 Biomed Central fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Mitchell, Tim O'Sullivan, Peter Burnett, Angus Straker, Leon Smith, Anne Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| title | Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| title_full | Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| title_fullStr | Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| title_full_unstemmed | Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| title_short | Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| title_sort | regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/38027 |